Re: Milter-induced temporary reject (can't read SMFIC_HEADER reply packet header)

From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Thu Oct 22 2009 - 15:58:37 EDT

  • Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Milter-induced temporary reject (can't read SMFIC_HEADER reply packet header)"

    On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:46:55PM +0200, David Schweikert wrote:

    > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:52:36 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
    > > Which version? All recommended patch sets applied?
    >
    > We have Solaris 10 (kernel patch 138888-03, dated January 2009).
    >
    > I did now a tcpdump during another such case and I found out that this
    > is happening during the DATA phase: the client is slow and it takes 30
    > minutes for it to transfer all the data. At the end, it manages to send
    > a '.', after which, the "Service unavailable" is sent by Postfix.
    >
    > Shouldn't Postfix react after smtpd_timeout and not wait until the end
    > of the data?

    No, the time-out limits the maximum *idle* time for the SMTP data
    transfer, not the total time taken. Why is the milter so impatient?
    Don't use impatient milters.

    -- 
    	Viktor.
    Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
    Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
    To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
    http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
    <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
    If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
    send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
    "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    

  • Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Milter-induced temporary reject (can't read SMFIC_HEADER reply packet header)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD