From: James A R Brown (no email)
Date: Mon Mar 23 2009 - 15:37:29 EDT
Hi Wietse,
The rpm in question that I was using is this one :-
http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.5/SRPMS/postfix-2.5.6-1.src.rpm
I have emailed Simon Mudd.
James
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:14 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Melvyn Sopacua:
> > > $manpage_directory/man1/postmap.1:f:root:-:644
> > > $manpage_directory/man1/postqueue.1:f:root:-:644
> > > $manpage_directory/man1/postsuper.1:f:root:-:644
> > > + $manpage_directory/man1/sendmail.postfix.1:f:root:-:644
> > > $manpage_directory/man5/access.5:f:root:-:644
> > > + $manpage_directory/man5/aliases.postfix.5:f:root:-:644
> > > $manpage_directory/man5/body_checks.5:f:root:-:644
> > > $manpage_directory/man5/canonical.5:f:root:-:644
> > > $manpage_directory/man5/cidr_table.5:f:root:-:644
> >
> > This isn't OS specific. The patch in the rpm is wrong, because since a few
> > versions there is a bounce(5) manpage at line 148.
>
> Correct. With Postfix 2.3 and later, file conf/postfix-files
> has a line with
>
> $manpage_directory/man5/bounce.5:f:root:-:644
>
> between the lines with "body_checks.5" and "canonical.5". So it
> looks like Fedora Core 10 is using an ancient version of their
> patchfile.
>
> Wietse
|
|
|