Re: smtpd_recipient_restrictions Check

From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Tue Mar 10 2009 - 13:43:47 EDT

  • Next message: LuKreme: "Re: virtual_alias_maps"

    On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Linux Addict wrote:

    > > > reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
    > > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
    > > > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
    > > > permit
    > >
    > > Fairly sensible overall.
    >
    > Is it better to place rbl rejections under smtpd_client_restrictions?

    No, they are just fine at the bottom of the recipient restrictions list.
    These are high latency lookups, and you want to do them last, giving
    other checks the opportunity to reject the mail cheaply.

    -- 
    	Viktor.
    Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
    Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
    To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
    http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
    <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
    If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
    send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
    "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    

  • Next message: LuKreme: "Re: virtual_alias_maps"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD