From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 13:16:11 EDT
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:10:49PM +0200, Benoit Giannangeli wrote:
> > Perhaps you could spell filter the way Postfix expects: ie. filter not
> > filtre?
>
> I don't think "filter" is a keyword and "filtre" refers to:
>
> filtre unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=Rq user=filter argv=/etc/postfix/socket_connect.pl 127.0.0.1 10027
>
> I wrote "filtre" instead of "filter" to make a difference between the
> script user (user=filter) and the filter name (filtre).
>
> > But you do have to understand. And you really don't understand:
> >
> > - The role of the message envelope
> >
> > - How SMTP differs from netcat and why
>
> I get it concerning the message envelope and thanks for the
> enlightenment. I'll just have to add the "${sender} ${recipient}"
> arguments to my script and pass them with the input to my program.
>
> > I am afraid my best recommendation is that you should not attempt this
> > on your own.
>
> I have to unfortunately: it's my internship mission.
>
> Anyway I'm still wondering why my script is not called.
One thing at a time, first get the design right. The protocol between
the script and the Java server is still broken by design.
-- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
|
|
|