From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2008 - 12:53:11 EDT
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Benoit Giannangeli wrote:
> The point is you do not have understood what i am doing.
But you do have to understand. And you really don't understand:
- The role of the message envelope
- How SMTP differs from netcat and why
> There is a Java service which is running and DOES failure collecting
> etc. The MimeMessage class of javax.mail DOES recipient adresses
> recognition that's why I don't need to pass them to my script.
That's where you're wrong. The headers don't contain "recipient"
addresses. Recipient addersses are carried in the message envelope.
> My script is just a way to interact with the real program and is
> simply copying the input into the socket, leaving the real process to
> the java program.
The message is not correctly encapsulated, there is no error reporting,
the message envelope is lost...
-- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
|
|
|