RE: Parent domains confusion?

From: MacShane, Tracy (no email)
Date: Sun May 04 2008 - 19:37:37 EDT

  • Next message: Jason Bailey, Sun Advocate Webmaster: "Re: Reply on receive of MS Office 2007 files..."

     

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From:
    > [mailto:] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
    > Sent: Friday, 2 May 2008 9:10 PM
    > To: MacShane, Tracy
    > Cc:
    > Subject: Re: Parent domains confusion?
    >
    > MacShane, Tracy:
    > > However, if I try to query the access map using postmap -q,
    > nothing is
    > > returned:
    > >
    > > [smtp3]# postmap -q "cpe-74-76-15-20.nycap.res.rr.com"
    > > hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
    > > [smtp3]#
    > >
    > > ...
    > > Running similar queries on PCRE and CIDR maps works as expected (ie.

    > > values like REJECT and OK are returned).
    >
    > The behavior of PCRE/CIDR maps is documented in the access table.
    >
    > The postmap -q command does not generate subnet or parent
    > domain queries.
    >
    > If I find the time I may add postmap options to simulate
    > subnet/parent domain queries; I recently added command-line
    > options to simulate header_checks (multi-line) and
    > body_checks queries, but I can't implement everything before
    > people need it.
    >
    > In the end, the substring query magic needs to be implemented
    > as reusable functions, so that it can be reused in postmap,
    > instead of being duplicated there.
    >
    > Wietse
    >

    That's great; thanks for the explanation. If a method of simulating a
    parent domains lookup becomes available, that would be fantastic, but at
    least it's the expected behaviour at present.

    Tracy


  • Next message: Jason Bailey, Sun Advocate Webmaster: "Re: Reply on receive of MS Office 2007 files..."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD