Re: header_checks question

From: Justin Piszcz (no email)
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 16:57:08 EDT

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Hiding internal IP address in bounce messages..."

    On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Noel Jones wrote:

    > At 03:36 PM 9/12/2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
    >
    >> Agree-- however, there are some nice regexp maps out their compiled for
    >> anti-spam purposes
    >
    > Such as?

    A couple:

    #
    # Malware Block List - http://www.malware.com.br
    # List for Postfix MTA
    # Generated at: 20070709224449 UTC
    #
    # http://www.malware.com.br/cgi/submit?action=list_postfix

    # t29.dk postfix header_checks regexp file, rev. 28c (2006-12-08)
    #
    #
    # Maintained by Niels Callesøe (dk pfy) <>
    # No patterns have been added since dec 2004. It appears AV vendors have either gotten the message
    # or these filters are simply enough. However, if you do see any "virus warnings" that slip
    # through, please send submissions to: . If you do not see your submission added,
    # it is probably because it would already have been caught by the expressions below.
    #
    # Usage (main.cf):
    # header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
    #
    # To reduce clutter in this file, all discussion, attribtions etc have been
    # moved to http://www.t29.dk/header_check_notes.php

    >
    >> and I'd rather keep them as-is and for my own rules use pcre where I can
    >> and hash maps for other purposes.
    >
    > pcre: is backward-compatible with maps intended for regexp:.
    >
    >> Justin.
    >
    > --
    > Noel Jones


  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Hiding internal IP address in bounce messages..."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD