Re: header_checks question

• Previous message: Ian Ward Comfort: "Re: PATCH 2.3 zero length CN"
• Maybe in reply to: Justin Piszcz: "header_checks question"
• Next in thread: Justin Piszcz: "Re: header_checks question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 03:36 PM 9/12/2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:

>Agree-- however, there are some nice regexp maps out their compiled
>for anti-spam purposes

Such as?

>and I'd rather keep them as-is and for my own rules use pcre where I
>can and hash maps for other purposes.

pcre: is backward-compatible with maps intended for regexp:.

>Justin.

-- 
Noel Jones 

• Previous message: Ian Ward Comfort: "Re: PATCH 2.3 zero length CN"
• Maybe in reply to: Justin Piszcz: "header_checks question"
• Next in thread: Justin Piszcz: "Re: header_checks question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]