Re: Strange Question

From: Scott Kitterman (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 17:13:20 EST

  • Next message: mouss: "Re: smtpd_restriction_classes Question"

    On Thursday 01 March 2007 17:09, Trevor Antczak wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > Alright, with the understanding that what I want to do here is a violation
    > of good policies, I have question. Here=B9s the background:
    >
    > I run a mailserver for my company here (lite3d.com). We=B9re a high tech
    > typ= e
    > place, and most of our users have laptops and high speed networks at home.
    > They=B9d like to be able to do work from home, but the problem is that most
    > o= f
    > them (us really) have Cox highspeed internet, which will not allow you to
    > hook up to remote mailservers through its network. You have to send all
    > o= f
    > your mail through smtp.east.cox.net or it doesn=B9t leave their network (I
    > suppose one could set up a mailserver that listens on a non-standard port
    > and bypass this, but it=B9s probably not worth the effort). Cox will allow
    > you to use whatever you want for a =B3from=B2 or =B3reply-to=B2 header, so
    > at least one of my users had the bright idea to setup an alternate SMTP in
    > her clien= t
    > to use the Cox server, but put her business address in the =B3from=B2
    > header. It works fine UNLESS she tries to send mail to someone local to our
    > domain.

    A better answer would probably be to enable the submission port (587) and have
    your users submit mail to your server that way.

    Scott K


  • Next message: mouss: "Re: smtpd_restriction_classes Question"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD