Re: Postfix rejecting NDRs with 501 5.5.4 Bad message size syntax ?

From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 13:46:34 EST

  • Next message: Charles Marcus: "Re: Postfix rejecting NDRs with 501 5.5.4 Bad message size syntax ?"

    On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:29:41PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:

    > >>>[2007-02-20-14:59:50/2488363952/312510.00-117] [I] (MAIL) From:<>
    > >>>size=1917>
    >
    > >>The extra ">" after the message size is bogus. The correct syntax is:
    > >>
    > >> MAIL FROM:<> SIZE=1917
    > >>
    > >>without a trailing ">".
    >
    > Ok, finally got mxlogic to admit they are the ones adding this trailing
    > '>' at the end of the size value being passed to us (they are just a
    > proxy in this case).
    >
    > They are working to fix the bug, but is there anything that I can do in
    > the meantime - that is reasonably simple to do - to allow NDRs to get
    > through? It doesn't look like it to me, but that's not saying much... ;)

    Patch the Postfix source to handle and ignore this special case if your
    C programming skills are up to this.

    -- 
    	Viktor.
    Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
    Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
    To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
    http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
    <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
    If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
    send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
    "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    

  • Next message: Charles Marcus: "Re: Postfix rejecting NDRs with 501 5.5.4 Bad message size syntax ?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD