- Previous message: Mark Watts: "Re: Multiple Relay Servers."
- Maybe in reply to: Becker, Robert: "Multiple Relay Servers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Steven Wayne (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 09:53:19 EST
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:42:06AM -0500, Becker, Robert wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am looking to implement an email gateway solution that will route
> appropriate mail to the appropriate email servers. We have two
> environments that produce email. One is a production based system the
> second is a QA. We would like to have a centralized postfix box accept
> all email from these environments and route them to the appropriate
> email server.
>
> For example:
>
> An email was sent from server1 to .
>
> This email get's sent to the postfix relay server.
>
> The postfix relay server sees it's going to company1.com so it forwards
> this email to the company1's mail server.
>
>
>
> A mail was sent from server2 to
>
> The email gets to the postfix relay server.
>
> The postfix relay server see's it's going to company2 so it forwards it
> to company2's email server.
>
> I've setup relay boxes that send all email to a certain email server,
> but never one that's worked like that.. Anyone have any help.
MX Records work for me.
Don't set up the relay server with a "relayhost" parameter. Let it use DNS
MX records.
> This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains
> information that may be confidential and/or privileged material. If you
> are not the intended recipient please notify the sender by reply e-mail
> immediately.
Please note that I am not the addressee of the original email and this
reply constitutes notification that I received it.
> Use, disclosure or reproduction of any information in this
> e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly
> prohibited.
Ah, well that's a shame because without "disclosure" I can't tell you
about it, and as I already said, I am not the addressee of the original
email. So you are, in effect, forbiding me in the second part what you
required me to do in the first part.
> Sterling Commerce is not liable for any loss or damage
> arising in any way from transmission of the message or use of its
> attachments.
I think you're still bound by the laws of your country no matter how your
disclaimer is worded.
> This email may contain links to third party web sites.
Aren't you sure?
> Sterling Commerce is not responsible for the content or privacy policies
> of such other sites and the existence of a link in this email does not
> imply an endorsement of the linked web site or the goods or services
> offered therein.
Then don't link to them.
Steven.
( Not a fan of disclaimers ).
-- Eat drink and be merry! Tommorrow you may be in Utah.
|
|
|