From: mouss (no email)
Date: Tue Jan 02 2007 - 18:02:31 EST
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:28:43PM +0100, mouss wrote:
>
>
>> fine like what? The MX records point to CNAMEs, which is illegal.
>>
>
> Though not RFC compliant, this is not usually a problem...
>
>
But the additionnal delay may cause problems, no?
|
|
|