Re: best greylist method

From: SATOH Kiyoshi (no email)
Date: Wed Aug 02 2006 - 22:47:43 EDT

  • Next message: Mihira Fernando: "Re: Is this necessary?"

    On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:15:14 -0500
    Mike Horwath <> wrote:
    Subject: Re: best greylist method

    > > I recommend Rgrey(S25R+greylisting) aiming at the same effect.
    > >
    > > S25R identifies whether the client is dynamic IP from the pattern of
    > > client FQDN.
    > > Only what matches to S25R does greylisting.
    >
    > sqlgrey does the same thing, kinda.
    >
    > It has greylisting by /24 unless the hostname matches a regex, at
    > that point it is instead done at the /32 level if the regex hits.
    >
    > The regex is looking for dynamic/end-user RHS matches for DNS.

    I read the source of sqlgrey.
    This is the exactly same as the function added with Rgrey patch.
    (http://k2net.hakuba.jp/pub/rgrey-0.2-1.21.tar.gz)
    I think the proposal of the same technique by another place to be a very glad.
    I think that S25R pattern is the same by the dyn_fqdn.regexp pattern.
    And, It is better that there is smtp_server.regexp white list.

    > And it does it all within the one policy daemon :)

    I think that the regexp filter should go with postfix(main.cf).
    Rgrey had done the regexp filter with (patched)postgrey daemon before.
    However, it changed like doing the filter with postfix.
    I thought that I was able to decrease the load for the method to pass policy daemon.

    -- 
    <> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/stealthinu/
    

  • Next message: Mihira Fernando: "Re: Is this necessary?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD