Re: best greylist method

From: Mike Horwath (no email)
Date: Tue Aug 01 2006 - 22:15:14 EDT

  • Next message: ankush grover: "Re: Postfix Restriction class not working properly"

    On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:31 AM, SATOH Kiyoshi wrote:
    > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:51:02 +0100
    > Simon Waters <> wrote:
    > Subject: Re: best greylist method
    >
    >> But I don't think these things are easily comparable. For example
    >> this box
    >> runs the SBL-XBL blacklist before greylisting, I dare say the
    >> database would
    >> be larger if we didn't, and one could easily grow the database by
    >> storing
    >> more information to do a better job, and no doubt it will grow
    >> with time.
    >
    > I recommend Rgrey(S25R+greylisting) aiming at the same effect.
    >
    > S25R identifies whether the client is dynamic IP from the pattern of
    > client FQDN.
    > Only what matches to S25R does greylisting.
    >
    > There is the following benefits in Rgrey.
    > - The risk of rejecting legitimate clients becomes lower.
    > - Postgrey database now contains less entries.

    sqlgrey does the same thing, kinda.

    It has greylisting by /24 unless the hostname matches a regex, at
    that point it is instead done at the /32 level if the regex hits.

    The regex is looking for dynamic/end-user RHS matches for DNS.

    And it does it all within the one policy daemon :)

    -- 
    Mike Horwath                                    
                              ipHouse - Welcome home!
    

  • Next message: ankush grover: "Re: Postfix Restriction class not working properly"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD