- Previous message: Michael & Julie Jones: "RE: Unknown mail transport errors..."
- Maybe in reply to: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Mon Jan 02 2006 - 09:43:51 EST
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:03:39PM -0800, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> Len Conrad wrote:
> >It's not 1995, or 2000.
>
> It doesn't matter if it's 1995, 2000, 2005, or 2037 -- when stopping
> mail becomes more important than delivering mail, there's no point in
> there being mail.
>
This is getting seriously off-topic. Setting the DNS-based reject codes
to 5XX is recommended as soon as one is confortable that the settings
are correct. Persistent 4XX rejects that *don't* represent temporary
conditions are worse for the sender.
So either use "reject_unknown_sender_domain", ... with 5XX codes after
brief testing with 4XX codes (or soft_bounce=yes), or don't use them
at all.
Let's not drift into rec.talk.* territory. No off-topic followups please.
-- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
|
|
|