Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?

From: Roger B.A. Klorese (no email)
Date: Mon Jan 02 2006 - 02:03:39 EST

Next message: LeVA: "Re: deferred mail expire limit"

Previous message: Todd A Green: "Re: postfix 2.2.7 executing aliases as nobody instead of owner of file"
Maybe in reply to: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Next in thread: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Len Conrad wrote:
> It's not 1995, or 2000.

It doesn't matter if it's 1995, 2000, 2005, or 2037 -- when stopping
mail becomes more important than delivering mail, there's no point in
there being mail.

Next message: LeVA: "Re: deferred mail expire limit"

Previous message: Todd A Green: "Re: postfix 2.2.7 executing aliases as nobody instead of owner of file"
Maybe in reply to: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Next in thread: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs