Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?

From: Roger B.A. Klorese (no email)
Date: Sun Jan 01 2006 - 14:38:22 EST

Next message: Len Conrad: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"

Previous message: Bastian Blank: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Maybe in reply to: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Next in thread: Len Conrad: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Bastian Blank wrote:
> Why do you respect 5xx replies from a downstream server and bounce the
> message? It may be temporarily misconfigured.
>

Fair enough. But I'm inclined to have an SMTP client believe an SMTP
server but question everything else.

Next message: Len Conrad: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"

Previous message: Bastian Blank: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Maybe in reply to: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Next in thread: Len Conrad: "Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs