Re: Better to do 550 instead of 450 for these?

From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Sun Jan 01 2006 - 10:06:50 EST

  • Next message: Michael & Julie Jones: "RE: Unknown mail transport errors..."

    On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 08:43:12PM -0800, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:

    > CN wrote:
    > >a.com is one of my virtual domains. I get a slew of these in the log,
    > >with .
    > >
    > >Is it better to do a 550 reject on these?
    >
    > No, it's not. Someone's DNS servers may be down for a bit -- that's why
    > a 4xx is used.
    >

    Postfix never returns 5XX for temporary lookup problems, even when it
    returns 5XX for NXDOMAIN and other hard failures. Setting the various
    reject codes to 5XX is safe and recommended once one is confident that
    the configuration is correct. This is better for the (legitimate) sender,
    because a timely bounce is much more useful than a 5 day delayed bounce.

    -- 
    	Viktor.
    Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
    Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
    To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
    http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
    <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
    If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
    send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
    "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
    

  • Next message: Michael & Julie Jones: "RE: Unknown mail transport errors..."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD