- Previous message: wolfgang: "Fwd: compu.net dnsbl's"
- Maybe in reply to: Sergio Ferreira: "Another SPAM doubt"
- Next in thread: Covington, Chris: "Re: Another SPAM doubt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Sergio Ferreira (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 12:10:36 EST
Hi, Chris,
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From:
>>>>>[mailto:] On Behalf Of
>>>>>Chris St. Pierre
>>>>>Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 2:47 PM
>>>>>To: Kelly Sauke
>>>>>Cc:
>>>>>Subject: Re: Another SPAM doubt
>>>>>
>>>>>We use Sophos PureMessage (not free), currently with Sun's
>>>>>JMS. We'll be moving to Postfix this summer, and taking
>>>>>PureMessage with us, as it integrates with Postfix.
>>>>>PureMessage is a joy to administer -- it includes both an
>>>>>easy web interface and a powerful CLI, very un*x-like
>>>>>behavior (i.e., well-documented, plain-text config files),
>>>>>and it's written mostly in Perl -- a plus for us, as we're
>>>>>pretty proficient in Perl here.
>>>>>
>>>>>The downside is cost, which is not inconsiderable.
>>>>>However, we looked at SpamAssassin and then at PureMessage
>>>>>and the decision was pretty easy.
>>>>>
>>>>>Chris St. Pierre
>>>>>Unix Systems Administrator
>>>>>Nebraska Wesleyan University
>>>>>
I read about It too, seems to be a good one really. But, the Boss wants 100%
free software solution. Therefore, if I propose It He gonna starts to kill
me very slowly. :-)
>>>>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Kelly Sauke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Michael Katz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SA/Amavis is clearly the most widely deployed solution on this
>>>>>>> mailing list, but there is another world that exists
>>>>>outside of the
>>>>>>> mailing list and there are many options that integrate
>>>>>with Postfix
>>>>>>> that are more accurate, require less administration and
>>>>>will perform better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How about some examples of these other options?
>>>>>>
Thanks,
Sergio
|
|
|