From: Sergio Ferreira (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 11:52:17 EST
Hi Mouss,
>>>>>> I still setting SPAM stuffs at my setup, now I have one
>>>>>doubt about
>>>>>> some third parts tools. I have known about integration
>>>>>of Postfix and
>>>>>> Clamav, Spamassassim too, instead of Postfix + Clamav +
>>>>>Amavis + Spamassassin.
>>>>>> Anyone had experienced boths cases for help me with the
>>>>>advantages and
>>>>>> the disadvantages between them?
>>>>>> Without Amavis my server will be trustworth too? My
>>>>>question is about
>>>>>> should I use Amavis or not? Some people says It is more
>>>>>easy to manage
>>>>>> these things with Amavis, It is true?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any conserning will be very wellcome to make things more clear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The first question is which filtering engine you want to
>>>>>use. some choices:
>>>>>
>>>>>- spamassassin. widely used. resource intensive. maintenance burden
I was thinking about to use Spamassassin. It worth or just is the mostly
used?
>>>>>- dspam. bayesian (with some variants). doc is not very clear.
This one I doesnīt heard about It, but when I see problems with
documentation then Iīd rather not even try. :-/
>>>>>- crm114, bogofilter, ....
Bogofilter... I read a little bit about, but I wasnīt able to choose for It.
Itīs similar to spamassassin? It is easy to setup and manage?
>>>>>
>>>>>so there are a lot of choices. some people daisy chain
>>>>>multiple engines.
Unless It is very recommended, I prefer only one engine. I belive It is easy
to fix problems and administering :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>amavisd-new:
>>>>>- good interface to spamassassin. no more fork per mail +
>>>>>works in gateway mode (so can filter relayed mail if you want)
>>>>>- can block bad attachments
>>>>>- compatible with many anti-virus solutions
>>>>>- support for policies ("policy banks")
It is well documented and easy to setup? I intending to adopt It.
Bye,
Sergio
|
|
|