Re: vacation doesn't work

From: Robert Cerny (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 16:10:14 EST

  • Next message: Covington, Chris: "Re: Another SPAM doubt"

    On 1.12.2005, at 21:49, Wietse Venema wrote:

    > Robert Cerny:
    >> to=<>, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered
    >> to command: /usr/bin/vacation -d cerny)
    >
    >
    > man vacation says:
    >
    > -d Send error/debug messages to stderr instead of
    > syslog. Other-
    > wise, fatal errors, such as calling vacation
    > with incorrect
    > arguments, or with non-existent logins, are logged in
    > the system
    > log file, using syslog(8). This should only be used
    > on the com-
    > mand line, not in your .forward file.
    >
    > It's really easier to debug when errors are logged.
    >
    > Wietse

    Thanks for your reply,
    but it doesn't make a difference imho:

    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/smtpd[20090]: connect from unknown
    [127.0.0.1]
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/smtpd[20090]: 86E4A1C085F:
    client=unknown[127.0.0.1]
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/cleanup[20081]: 86E4A1C085F: message-
    id=<>
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/qmgr[4469]: 86E4A1C085F:
    from=<>, size=804, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/smtpd[20090]: disconnect from unknown
    [127.0.0.1]
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin amavis[19757]: (19757-05) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL
    [127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1] <> -> <>,
    Message-ID: <20051201210733 dot 83EE91C085D at marvin dot dataline dot cz>, mail_id:
    o7-m4CGzr2QN, Hits: -, 491 ms
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/smtp[20088]: 83EE91C085D:
    to=<>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=24,
    status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=19757-05, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025):
    250 Ok: queued as 86E4A1C085F)
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/qmgr[4469]: 83EE91C085D: removed
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/local[20091]: 86E4A1C085F:
    to=<>, relay=local, delay=0, status=sent (delivered
    to command: /usr/bin/vacation cerny)
    Dec 1 22:07:57 marvin postfix/qmgr[4469]: 86E4A1C085F: removed

    Or did I understand it wrong?

    Robert


  • Next message: Covington, Chris: "Re: Another SPAM doubt"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD