- Previous message: dogbert: "Re: timeout after DATA Error"
- Maybe in reply to: Sergio Ferreira: "Another SPAM doubt"
- Next in thread: Udo Rader: "Re: Another SPAM doubt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Chris St. Pierre (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 11:46:35 EST
We use Sophos PureMessage (not free), currently with Sun's JMS. We'll
be moving to Postfix this summer, and taking PureMessage with us, as
it integrates with Postfix. PureMessage is a joy to administer -- it
includes both an easy web interface and a powerful CLI, very un*x-like
behavior (i.e., well-documented, plain-text config files), and it's
written mostly in Perl -- a plus for us, as we're pretty proficient in
Perl here.
The downside is cost, which is not inconsiderable. However, we looked
at SpamAssassin and then at PureMessage and the decision was pretty
easy.
Chris St. Pierre
Unix Systems Administrator
Nebraska Wesleyan University
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Kelly Sauke wrote:
>Michael Katz wrote:
>
>> SA/Amavis is clearly the most widely deployed solution on this mailing
>> list, but there is another world that exists outside of the mailing
>> list and there are many options that integrate with Postfix that are
>> more accurate, require less administration and will perform better.
>
>
>How about some examples of these other options?
>
|
|
|