From: mouss (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 10:09:16 EST
Sergio Ferreira a écrit :
> Hi List,
>
> I still setting SPAM stuffs at my setup, now I have one doubt about some
> third parts tools. I have known about integration of Postfix and Clamav,
> Spamassassim too, instead of Postfix + Clamav + Amavis + Spamassassin.
> Anyone had experienced boths cases for help me with the advantages and the
> disadvantages between them?
> Without Amavis my server will be trustworth too? My question is about should
> I use Amavis or not? Some people says It is more easy to manage these things
> with Amavis, It is true?
>
> Any conserning will be very wellcome to make things more clear.
>
The first question is which filtering engine you want to use. some choices:
- spamassassin. widely used. resource intensive. maintenance burden
- dspam. bayesian (with some variants). doc is not very clear.
- crm114, bogofilter, ....
so there are a lot of choices. some people daisy chain multiple engines.
amavisd-new:
- good interface to spamassassin. no more fork per mail + works in
gateway mode (so can filter relayed mail if you want)
- can block bad attachments
- compatible with many anti-virus solutions
- support for policies ("policy banks")
|
|
|