Re: Another SPAM doubt

From: Michael Katz (no email)
Date: Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:14:27 EST

  • Next message: Wietse Venema: "PATCH: Weird bounces with Postfix, LMTP and Cyrus"

    There are many antispam solutions for Postfix that are not Amavis
    based. Amavis relies on SpamAssassin, one of the slowest spam analysis
    engines that comes with a huge administrative burden for certain (not
    all) installations. SA/Amavis is clearly the most widely deployed
    solution on this mailing list, but there is another world that exists
    outside of the mailing list and there are many options that integrate
    with Postfix that are more accurate, require less administration and
    will perform better. Don't forget about the great SMTP level facilities
    that Postfix provides as well, which are well documented on the list.

    M Katz

    Sergio Ferreira wrote:

    >Hi List,
    >
    >I still setting SPAM stuffs at my setup, now I have one doubt about some
    >third parts tools. I have known about integration of Postfix and Clamav,
    >Spamassassim too, instead of Postfix + Clamav + Amavis + Spamassassin.
    >Anyone had experienced boths cases for help me with the advantages and the
    >disadvantages between them?
    >Without Amavis my server will be trustworth too? My question is about should
    >I use Amavis or not? Some people says It is more easy to manage these things
    >with Amavis, It is true?
    >
    >Any conserning will be very wellcome to make things more clear.
    >
    >
    >Thanks,
    >
    >Sergio
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >


  • Next message: Wietse Venema: "PATCH: Weird bounces with Postfix, LMTP and Cyrus"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD