- Previous message: Covington, Chris: "Re: Sendmail X [ot?]"
- Maybe in reply to: /dev/rob0: "Sendmail X [ot?]"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Sendmail X [ot?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Cami (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 09:32:11 EST
Covington, Chris wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:33:10PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> I don't think it's completely off topic to mention here that Sendmail X
>> has been released. It looks interesting ... well, it looks a lot like
>> Postfix, really. :) Congratulations to Claus A?mann and contributors.
>>
>> http://sendmail.org/sm-X/
>
> Is this a fork of sendmail or the next version? Why bother?
Its a new version from scratch.
> No I'm not
> trying to sound like a Postfix snob, just wondering why they didn't
> recommend a move to Postfix instead of designing something similar
> that's so incompatible with the existing userbase.
Like it or not, Sendmail will be around for a long
time. I'd rather see them trying to come up with a
new design instead of leaving the current (inferior)
version as is.
Cami
|
|
|