Re: OT: Extra MX records

From: mouss (no email)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 03:48:21 EST

  • Next message: mouss: "Re: Verifying sender address on locally submitted mail?"

    Mark Bleyerveld a écrit :

    >Hi all
    >
    >A client of mine is having a problem with spam coming through their backup
    >MX (not under their control). I know the consensus about this situation, but
    >I can't convince them to lose their backup entirely.
    >
    >I saw earlier this year a post about adding extra MX records to reduce this
    >problem - listing the primary MTA as the first, second and last priority MX
    >(preferably with different IPs), and leaving the backup MX as third priority
    >record.
    >
    >Any comments on this? Any respectable/authoritative links to help me
    >convince the client would be great.
    >
    >
    This is a hack that may or may not work, and that may cause trouble to
    legit mail.

    >Failing that, are there any authoritative links making the case for losing
    >the backup altogether, which would be the preferred option.
    >
    >
    The list archives?


  • Next message: mouss: "Re: Verifying sender address on locally submitted mail?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD