- Previous message: mouss: "Re: Virtual Vacation problem - what did I miss ?"
- Maybe in reply to: JJ: "virtual delivery agent, multiple maildirs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 17:35:03 EDT
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:29:14PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Victor Duchovni a ?crit :
>
> >>why not use an MDA such as maildrop? this way you can do whatever you
> >>want.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Because this would be wrong. A delivery agent performing final delivery
> >to mailboxes must do so *atomically* for each queue file recipient,
> >because Postfix will either consider the delivery successful or failed
> >for each queue file recipient, there is no "half-delivered" state.
> >
> >
> I understand.
>
> On the other hand, if I send mail to A, and A receives it, I don't want
> to get a bounce when he does something with this message (copies to n
> files, sends to a data mining or archiving program, forwards to his
> friends or to a mumble_bcc_mumble). Since I didn't intend to send to A's
> friends, I don't consider such forwarding as "attached" to my
> transaction. It's more of a local processing issue.
>
You are confusing forwarding over SMTP (which can return separate errors
for each recipient) with final delivery via a program that confirms
success failure with a single exit code.
-- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
|
|
|