From: Angel L. Mateo (no email)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 03:03:14 EDT
El lun, 05-09-2005 a las 17:08 +0200, Tony Earnshaw escribió:
> man, 05.09.2005 kl. 08.50 skrev Angel L. Mateo:
>
> [...]
>
> > I think I have a robust LDAP configuration.
>
> And I think you might not have. As posted. Did you do that?
> The OpenLDAP servers you are running, are basically running crap
> versions that are known for corrupting their databases. No, it's not me
> that rules here, it's the OpenLDAP list (o.k., including my owm
Maybe, the openldap version I have has problems (I am now migrating to
2.2.23). But my openldap servers are not corrupting databases. I now
because while my postfix server is not working, I can ask the openldap
and it responds with correct information. Moreover, I have other postfix
server that uses the same ldap directory, and it doesn't have any
problem
> experience). Personally I've changed to 2.3 long ago on this test rig,
> and lately 2.3.7. The only supported 2.2 "stable" version is 2.2.28,
> running on my production rigs. I suggest you update.
>
I am updating, but I don't think the problem is with ldap server. All
the other servers I have using the ldap directory are working without
any problem (I have one running without any problem more than 5 months)
-- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o) y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\ http://www.um.es/atica _(___V Tfo: 968367590 Fax: 968398337
|
|
|