Re: Problem with private/proxymap (more info)

From: Tony Earnshaw (no email)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 11:08:15 EDT

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Postfix + Majordomo + Amavis + Clamav"

    man, 05.09.2005 kl. 08.50 skrev Angel L. Mateo:

    [...]

    > I think I have a robust LDAP configuration.

    And I think you might not have. As posted. Did you do that?

    > I have two ldap servers
    > (one is the master and the other is the slave) running in an
    > active-active configuration (obviously, just one the servers accept
    > updates).

    The OpenLDAP servers you are running, are basically running crap
    versions that are known for corrupting their databases. No, it's not me
    that rules here, it's the OpenLDAP list (o.k., including my owm
    experience). Personally I've changed to 2.3 long ago on this test rig,
    and lately 2.3.7. The only supported 2.2 "stable" version is 2.2.28,
    running on my production rigs. I suggest you update.

    [...]

    --Tonni

    -- 
    mail: 
    http://www.billy.demon.nl
    

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Postfix + Majordomo + Amavis + Clamav"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD