Re: incoming queue behaves like a blackhole

From: Adrian von Bidder (no email)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 03:20:40 EDT

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Postfix + Majordomo + Amavis + Clamav"

    On Friday 02 September 2005 16.11, Aurelien Barrere wrote:
    > Sep  1 14:32:02 bounce postfix/qmgr[29484]: warning: lots of deferred
    > mail, that is bad for performance

    Why are these messages being deferred? If it's regular mail (deferrals due
    to greylisting, the target MX being unreachable just now etc. etc.) and
    just results from the huge influx of new messages from your incoming queue,
    you can probably just ignore it for now and wait for the problem to be
    dealt with in the normal way.

    Normally, mailq gives you this information, but with the queue sizes you
    have I've got no idea about how fast this is. Else you can look at some of
    the messages with postcat.

    cheers
    -- vbi

    -- 
    Three bugs within these 512 bytes compromised the security [of the XBox]
    completely - a bunch of hackers found them within days after first
    looking at the code. Why hasn't Microsoft Corp. been able to do the
    same? Why?
            -- http://www.xbox-linux.org/wiki/The_Hidden_Boot_Code_of_the_Xbox
    Perhaps because true hackers don't like to implement stupid license
    enforcement schemes like this?
    
    



  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Postfix + Majordomo + Amavis + Clamav"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD