From: Angel L. Mateo (no email)
Date: Mon Sep 05 2005 - 02:50:48 EDT
El sáb, 03-09-2005 a las 15:01 -0400, Victor Duchovni escribió:
> /etc/passwd or "db" periodically, ... If nss_ldap, ... must be used,
> provide enough replica servers and sufficiently robust networking to
> make lookup failure extremely improbable. Consider "-o
> soft_bounce=yes"
I think I have a robust LDAP configuration. I have two ldap servers
(one is the master and the other is the slave) running in an
active-active configuration (obviously, just one the servers accept
updates). I have 3 postfix servers and two apache servers reading their
users from the ldap directory. Noone of these servers have any problem,
except one of them (the other two postfix servers have the same
configuration). I have another server monitoring the ldap servers and it
hasn't discover any downtime of the ldap servers.
> Things would likely be different had you enabled nss_ldap, in which case
> occasional false "unknown" bounces from local(8) or rejects from
> smtpd(8) using unix:passwd.byname in local_recipient_maps are to be
> expected.
>
I don't have any error of this kind. My postfix servers gives me the
error when I try to connect to it, the error is previous to the helo
answer from the server.
-- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o) y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\ http://www.um.es/atica _(___V Tfo: 968367590 Fax: 968398337
|
|
|