Re: Poor Man's Greylisting

From: Jorey Bump (no email)
Date: Sat Aug 06 2005 - 17:57:54 EDT

  • Next message: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Poor Man's Greylisting"

    Wietse Venema wrote:

    > If you're concerned about listing a primary MX record without valid
    > A record, you could instead supply an IP address that immediately
    > returns a TCP RESET. This could be done with a packet filter rule,
    > or by giving a machine a second external IP address without an SMTP
    > listener on it.

     From your point of view, which is the kindest to a connecting Postfix
    MTA? In the event of an NXDOMAIN, Postfix appears to query for the IP
    address of the next priority MX and gets on with business. At this
    point, the speed of the resolver is the only performance issue, and the
    DNS cache should speed things up, as well.

    I'm having less success in determining the impact of trying to contact
    an unresponsive host. For the moment, I'm more interested in reducing
    the burden on the connecting host than in RFC-compliance. If this
    technique became widespread, would these initial connection attempts be
    a precious waste of time on a busy server, or is the effect negligible?
    Does SMTP connection caching help in this case?


  • Next message: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Poor Man's Greylisting"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD