From: Tony Earnshaw (no email)
Date: Mon Aug 01 2005 - 14:23:50 EDT
man, 01.08.2005 kl. 17.53 skrev Magnus Bäck:
[...]
> > All my alias maps and virtual alias maps are in LDAP, which uses
> > standard table lookups and "just works". If I do use an ordinarily
> > formatted hash map for /etc/aliases, that works too. In fact, I can
> > do more with such a map than with a newaliases-formatted map.
>
> How so?
Basically because there are no artificial constraints. The aliases map
is specifically designed for local users and LHS/RHS addresses in it
can't be qualified. Hash, LDAP etc. maps don't have these constraints;
what's more, wild cards are supported. If there's no need to use the
constraints that the /etc/aliases format imposes, I'd rather not use
that format.
> > Neither are virtual alias maps, as detailed in VIRTUAL_README,
> > formatted in the newaliases (or as you put it "old unix style
> > aliases files) style.
>
> No, of course they're not. The format of virtual alias files is
> documented in virtual(5).
Yes. Nothing to stop one using LDAP or MySQL etc. for this, they're all
interchangeable with hash for virtual.
Best,
--Tonni
-- mail: http://www.billy.demon.nl
|
|
|