Re: Thanks - and spam stats

From: Adrian von Bidder (no email)
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 02:45:55 EDT

  • Next message: sam wun: "Possible incorrect index"

    On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12.27, Simon Waters wrote:

    > So far there is no evidence that the greylisting is becoming less
    > effective with time, which was one of my concerns (minor concern - the
    > obvious solution involves using "rm" regularly).

    My concern with greylisting was that the spammers would catch up and start
    implementing queueing in their zombies. I have, though, observed that
    sometimes DNS blacklists are quick enough even in cases where a spammer
    *does* try a second time. So I hope with dnsrbls becoming more
    sophisticated - for instance by combining multiple data inputs like dcc,
    the spammers won't really be able to catch up.

    And I don't really worry about spammers starting to use ISP mailservers to a
    great extent - too many people would start to block these (as I am starting
    to block hotmails outgoing mailservers as I receive quite a lot spam from
    there currently.)

    cheers
    -- vbi




  • Next message: sam wun: "Possible incorrect index"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD