From: Matt Fretwell (no email)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 07:47:35 EDT
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > > Not necessary for a mailbox in a virtual_alias_domain. The OP's
> > > most recent approach is correct, and the advice above is not.
> The basic requirement is that every mailbox in a virtual alias domain
> needs to be (ultimately) rewritten to a mailbox in a real domain. It is
> not possible to create transport(5) table entries directly for virtual
> alias mailboxes. No access table entries are requried to accept these,
> because all the listed recipients are automatically accepted.
If the recipient is *not* listed in virtual_*_maps, but the recipient
domain is a valid domain, virtual or otherwise, the method with access and
transport should also work, should it not? Or have I missed another quirk
of virtual_*?
Matt
|
|
|