- Previous message: Victor Duchovni: "Re: Postfix + maildrop"
- Maybe in reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Non-production Postfix DSN support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Victor Duchovni (no email)
Date: Wed May 18 2005 - 13:01:00 EDT
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:49:23PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > By this I think you mean that it will not blithely replace a non-empty
> > envelope sender with an empty envelope sender. This seems sensible.
> >
> > I do have a question, how would such a replacement break BATV or SRS?
>
> These rewrite the MAIL FROM when delivering mail, and recognize only
> those rewritten return addresses as authentic.
Right, so when mail is sent from <>, the recipient address is expected
to be in BATV format. It is not Postfix breaking BATV, so much as BATV
objecting to <> when the recipient is not munged... got it thanks.
-- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
|
|
|