- Previous message: Tad Marko: "reject_rbl_client"
- Maybe in reply to: Tad Marko: "reject_rbl_client"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: /dev/rob0 (no email)
Date: Mon May 16 2005 - 01:23:11 EDT
On Sunday 15 May 2005 23:43, Tad Marko wrote:
> I have several reject_rbl_client directives in my main.cf under
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but I am wondering if it might make
> more sense to move those to smtpd_client_restrictions. Any comments?
Given the default value of smtpd_delay_reject, there is no functional
difference except for whitelisting.
Advantage of smtpd_recipient_restrictions: you can put most if not all
restrictions in one place.
Advantage of smtpd_client_restrictions: it looks right. :)
Wietse has an example in SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger about how you
can benefit from splitting restrictions into other lists. In fact you
should read that whole document, and I think you'll understand it
better.
--
mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0"
or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
|
|
|