Re: Blocking mail from=<>

From: Greg A. Woods (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 03 2005 - 17:22:21 EST

  • Next message: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Blocking mail from=<>"

    [ On Thursday, March 3, 2005 at 11:27:23 (+0100), Lionel Bouton wrote: ]
    > Subject: Re: Blocking mail from=<>
    >
    > The problem is the amount of quarantine (or tagged messages) you
    > generate, the amount of CPU/disk space needed to filter the SPAM, the
    > time the users must spent searching for FP.

    So? Solve _your_ problem -- don't foist it on others!!!!!

    > Greylisting takes away a
    > good chunk of this, even after UCE controls.

    No, all it does is hand the problem off to others.

    Either accept mail when it's offered, as efficiently and quickly as
    possible, or reject it outright right away and be done with it.

    > Don't think so, the amount of time a server saves processing messages
    > that only greylisting can temporarily refuse far outweight the time
    > needed to process the occasional messages that have to be processed
    > twice.

    You're looking at this problem from a _very_ selfish perspective.

    -- 
    						Greg A. Woods
    H:+1 416 218-0098  W:+1 416 489-5852 x122  VE3TCP  RoboHack <>
    Planix, Inc. <>          Secrets of the Weird <>
    

  • Next message: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Blocking mail from=<>"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD