- Previous message: Bobby: "Re[3]: Blocking mail from=<>"
- Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "Re[3]: Blocking mail from=<>"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Noel Jones (no email)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 14:41:23 EST
At 01:22 PM 3/1/2005, Bobby wrote:
>Hello Noel,
>
>yep, sorry for that, it seems i missed some info.
>I fought this problem about two years ago, but I did not dig in to it
>then. It appears I am digging with wrong examples now :)
>
>rob0:
>
>Basically, I don't like using html in emails at all.
>Could you please be more specific about the broken MUA, because it
>seems fine to me and I think this would validate as HTML 4.01.
>
>About the DNS, please comment on this:
>
>;; QUESTION SECTION:
>;cyberinbox.com. IN MX
>
>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>cyberinbox.com. 3600 IN MX 0 dev.null.
>
>;; Query time: 171 msec
>;; SERVER: 67.18.235.194#53(ns1.adrress.com)
>;; WHEN: Tue Mar 1 21:20:25 2005
>;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 56
This mail list prefers messages in plain-text only - no HTML at all. We
also very strongly prefer that answers come below the text they refer to;
that way the archives make sense. Posting your answers at the top of the
message is called top-posting and is considered quite rude. As I myself am
rather rude, having belched four times while composing this message, I
answer you anyway.
Your DNS is probably fine. Don't accept and bounce mail you don't want.
% host -t mx cyberinbox.com
cyberinbox.com mail is handled by 0 dev.null.
cyberinbox.com apparently doesn't care to receive the bounce you are trying
to send them. You can reject mail from senders with bogus MX records using
check_sender_mx_access and an appropriate map. Read the docs and list
archives for hints on how to do this.
-- Noel Jones
|
|
|