Re: POP3/IMAP Server Recommendations

From: Greg A. Woods (no email)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2005 - 03:20:23 EST

  • Next message: Helmut Jarausch: "high water mark for mailbox_size ?"

    [ On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 22:40:41 (+0100), Magnus Bäck wrote: ]
    > Subject: Re: POP3/IMAP Server Recommendations
    >
    > Maildirs can be manipulated with standard tools. For example, I normally
    > use an MUA to access mailboxes but I also have the option of using e.g.
    > find(1), grep(1), and mv(1).

    Sure, OK, fine. But since 99.999% of all e-mail users these days don't
    have filesystem access to their mailboxes anyway, even if they do know
    how to use any of the filesystem level unix tools or even any kind of
    MUA that can access Maildirs directly, they won't be able to in the
    first place. Your argument is only meaningful for a few of us geeks,
    and we should all be very well capable of dealing with the likes of
    Cyrus IMAP.

    > Which was my point; you don't have to jump through hoops to use standard
    > tools (as well as mutt) with maildirs.

    My point was that since for the most part only admins ever go bopping
    around directly in mailbox filesystems, forcing them to jump through
    some extra hoops to make sure they do things correctly is a "Very Good
    Thing".

    Maildir might be OK, or even great, for those geeks with their own local
    filesystem access, but as others have already said quite well, Cyrus
    IMAP is far more suitable for "enterprise class" mail systems, such as
    those most any ISP might operate.

    -- 
    						Greg A. Woods
    H:+1 416 218-0098  W:+1 416 489-5852 x122  VE3TCP  RoboHack <woods at robohack dot ca>
    Planix, Inc. <>          Secrets of the Weird <woods at weird dot com>
    

  • Next message: Helmut Jarausch: "high water mark for mailbox_size ?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD