Re: [OT] Dns servers

From: Magnus Bäck (no email)
Date: Sat Jan 01 2005 - 14:28:25 EST

  • Next message: Magnus Bäck: "Re: Q: How to ... Generic names for mail users"

    On Saturday, January 01, 2005 at 19:56 CET,
         Planet X Mail <> wrote:

    > In a default postfix install ( v 2 ) does this 'bloating' use up alot
    > of sys resources?

    How long is a piece of string?

    > Or does the default config/install pretty much make postfix efficient
    > on memory and cpu?

    Because of the multi-daemon architecture, Postfix is probably not the
    best choice if process, memory, and/or file descriptor resources are
    very limited. For normal systems, Postfix is no less efficient then any
    other MTA. As Wietse points out, a large portion of the added source
    code lies in optional modules (verify(8), scache(8), proxymap(8),
    anvil(8), ...) that aren't used unless you want them to be. But sure,
    the memory footprint of today's Postfix is larger than a five year old
    Postfix.

    > Bloat was a prob with sendmail are we seeing postfix going down a path
    > of inefficencly?

    Hardly.

    -- 
    Magnus Bäck
    

  • Next message: Magnus Bäck: "Re: Q: How to ... Generic names for mail users"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD