From: Gerard Whelan (no email)
Date: Wed Dec 01 2004 - 12:36:06 EST
Thanks Victor,
you have been more than helpful. I think we may scrap the MX
backup. There is no perfect solution to our problem. Thanks again.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:18:58 -0500, Victor Duchovni
<> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:12:04AM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > Note that Postfix already implements sensible concurrency limits by
> > default. Tuning this down for a high volume relay stream between a
> > backup MX and the primary is unwise.
> >
>
> Oh, and I forgot to mention: pointless. You've already accepted the
> mail on the backup MX, so it is going to be delivered. It is entirely
> futile to delay the transmission between the backup MX and the primary,
> if the primary starts rejecting the mail, you have a backscatter host,
> if the primary discards it, why not do it fast. Regain your professional
> pride, don't accede to pointless constraints!
>
>
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
>
> To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
> <mailto:?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
>
>
|
|
|