RE: abused webmail

From: Paul Hutchings (no email)
Date: Wed Sep 01 2004 - 13:14:50 EDT


Perhaps could you limit the number of accounts that can be created from an
IP address within a given time period, or I've seen sites that when you
signup have a picture with a random number "hidden" in it to work around
automated signups..

I don't know what more you could do (probably digressing a little here but
I'd be interested what others would suggest), but I would say that if you
allow spam but try to limit the rate rather than stop the spammers you will
end up blacklisted which tends to not be good for business plans :-)

good luck with whatever you do!

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:]On Behalf Of Pavel Urban
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:08 PM
> To: John Groseclose
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: abused webmail
>
>
> John Groseclose wrote:
> > At 6:28 PM +0200 9/1/04, Pavel Urban wrote:
> >
> > Let's see.
> >
> > You're allowing anyone to go create a new account, then use
> it to spam,
> > and you're worried more about limiting the rate of the
> outbound spam
> > than verifying user information for those people signing up for the
> > accounts and preventing them from signing up for multiple accounts?
> >
> > I'll bet that within a short period of time your
> mailservers appear on
> > most of the DNSBLs on the planet. And that, IMNSHO, would
> be a good thing.
> >
>
> Well, my personal opinion is that freemails should be
> eliminated without
> mercy, but I have to live with business plans of our company.
> BTW, how
> should I 'verify' user information or 'prevent' them from creating
> multiple accounts? But anyway, I'll try to persuade marketing guys to
> limit account creation to our IP pools.
>
> Thanks for your opinion, anyway.
>
> P.U.
>








Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD