From: Tony Earnshaw (no email)
Date: Mon Mar 01 2004 - 15:42:47 EST
man, 01.03.2004 kl. 19.52 skrev Sam Carleton:
> Sam Carleton, the stupid one
This is too good to let lie. Are you bald after those 10 years of not
understanding man pages? If you aren't, you obviously didn't tear hard
enough ;)
canonical is simply a way of writing a *fully qualified* address from
one format to another. At least it is for me, and that works for me.
E.g:
mail for postmaster-at and abuse-at-domain_literals has to go to someone
the system knows about:
postmaster@[212.238.97.135]
abuse@[212.238.97.135]
The system accepts mail for abuse at domain_literal, because canonical
rewrites to a form Postfix understands. In this case
local_recipient_maps.
Mail for would go to ,
if my network, canonical maps and my DNS were so configured (which
they're not).
.
> mikejones mj
Where have you told your Postfix configuration that it should accept
mail for mikejones or mj without them being qualified? No, seriously,
*where* have you told Postfix that?
Start glueing the hair back on ;)
--Tonni
-- mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl http://www.billy.demon.nl
|
|
|