From: Loic Minier (lool+)
Date: Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:17:38 EST
Wietse Venema <> - Sat, Jan 31, 2004:
> True, but do really you lose much when the before-queue content
> filter cannot be made dependent on client IP address or on what
> the client says in HELO? It's much more likely to be destination
> and/or direction dependent, and Postfix already can do that.
Well, I've got a "weak" MTA to deal with (wether I like it or not) and
Postfix is there to protect this MTA against a lot of different things.
I would be comforted if I could "route" the messages for postmaster@,
abuse@, and other addresses, or use other rules to either let the
message be handled by the "weak" MTA or continue into Postfix.
This has nothing to do with common requirements, and this is nonsence
simply because I could hurt the simple scenario where a message would
be sent RCPT TO postmaster + RCPT TO an address handled by the "weak"
MTA.
I hope the above is clear enough, I think there's nothing to do with
proxy. The only real way to do this is to use the policy feature and
split message deliveries according to the list of recipients. The main
problem is the additional I/O cost that comes with this solution.
-- Loic Minier <>
|
|
|