Postfix 0402
By Thread

Most recent messages
3545 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
About this archive
Other mail archives

Starting: Sun Feb 01 2004 - 00:07:00 EST
Ending: Sun Feb 29 2004 - 23:33:24 EST

• How do I manage my MySQL email accounts DALive Editor (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 00:05:53 EST)
• Re: Is there a way to have diffrent limits on income and out going smtp processes? James Sizemore (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 01:48:44 EST)
  • Re: Is there a way to have diffrent limits on income and out going smtp processes? Jacob Elder (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 12:44:16 EST)
• Re: Debian ChangeLog Bob Proulx (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 02:21:49 EST)
• Re: Virtual Domains Question Ralf Hildebrandt (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 02:30:18 EST)
  • Re: Virtual Domains Question Andreas Braukmann (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 04:33:41 EST)
• 2 instances of Postfix with different delivery agents?? Morten Trab (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 03:22:23 EST)
• SPAM bounces to local mailboxes Serega Romanovsky (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 03:59:49 EST)
• Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Luca Berra (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 04:37:29 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 06:03:41 EST)
    • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:47:56 EST)
      • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:56:37 EST)
      • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 14:06:01 EST)
      • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:22:39 EST)
    • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:33:48 EST)
    • MAILDROP_README and other custom transports (was: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231) Matthias Andree (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:46:31 EST)
      • Re: MAILDROP_README and other custom transports (was: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231) Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:21:41 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 07:29:25 EST)
    • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:02:44 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 07:19:04 EST)
    • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Matthias Andree (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:23:09 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:09:37 EST)
    • PATCH: other suggested doc changes Liviu Daia (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:04:03 EST)
      • Re: PATCH: other suggested doc changes Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:34:00 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:28:41 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:09:33 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 14:04:35 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 13:48:24 EST)
  • Re: Patch (diff -u) for MAILDROP_README postfix-2.0.16-20031231 Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:23:52 EST)
• difference beetween XXXX_destination_concurrency_limit and maxproc in master.cf Luca Berra (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 04:43:50 EST)
  • Re: difference beetween XXXX_destination_concurrency_limit and maxproc in master.cf Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:18:08 EST)
  • Postfix gaining credits! Andrea Tassinari (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:22:24 EST)
    • Re: Postfix gaining credits! (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:14:05 EST)
    • RE: Postfix gaining credits! Peter Santiago (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 07:19:46 EST)
      • RE: Postfix gaining credits! (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:44:22 EST)
    • RE: Postfix gaining credits! Peter Santiago (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 00:15:57 EST)
  • Re: difference beetween XXXX_destination_concurrency_limit and maxproc in master.cf Luca Berra (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:45:26 EST)
  • Re: difference beetween XXXX_destination_concurrency_limit and maxproc in master.cf (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:11:03 EST)
• empty x-envelope-from when bounced (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:11:54 EST)
  • Re: empty x-envelope-from when bounced Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 05:23:32 EST)
  • Re: empty x-envelope-from when bounced (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 06:10:08 EST)
  • Re: empty x-envelope-from when bounced Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 06:16:24 EST)
  • Re: empty x-envelope-from when bounced Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:08:08 EST)
• Idea to disappoint Spammers Rene Bartsch (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 06:00:47 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 06:04:20 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Orlando Andico (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:36:48 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Rene Bartsch (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:49:11 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Orlando Andico (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:51:16 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Hans Spaans (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:03:30 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:23:16 EST)
    • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:28:06 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Rene Bartsch (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:51:13 EST)
  • Re: Idea to disappoint Spammers Greg A. Woods (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 14:15:26 EST)
  • RE: Idea to disappoint Spammers Peter Santiago (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 07:25:32 EST)
• simple logfile analysis tool Jeroen Wijnands (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 07:22:57 EST)
  • Re: simple logfile analysis tool (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 07:23:12 EST)
  • Re: simple logfile analysis tool Ralf Hildebrandt (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 07:22:54 EST)
  • Re: simple logfile analysis tool Hans Spaans (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:18:39 EST)
  • Re: simple logfile analysis tool Tony Earnshaw (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:17:51 EST)
• Getting TLS to work on Suse 9.0? Paul Hutchings (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:39:54 EST)
  • Re: Getting TLS to work on Suse 9.0? Luca Berra (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:55:13 EST)
  • RE: Getting TLS to work on Suse 9.0? Paul Hutchings (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:00:21 EST)
  • Re: Getting TLS to work on Suse 9.0? 'Luca Berra' (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:38:42 EST)
    • Re: Getting TLS to work on Suse 9.0? Carsten Hoeger (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:57:12 EST)
      • Re: Getting TLS to work on Suse 9.0? Lutz Jaenicke (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 05:34:14 EST)
• Virtual domains question part 2 FastNet USA (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 09:47:07 EST)
  • Re: Virtual domains question part 2 Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:20:21 EST)
  • Re: Virtual domains question part 2 FastNet USA (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:02:59 EST)
• using clamav Keyser Soze (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:56:15 EST)
  • Re: using clamav Ralf Hildebrandt (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:57:20 EST)
• backscatter - # of open/free smtp connections Austen Constable (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:04:09 EST)
  • Re: backscatter - # of open/free smtp connections (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:37:10 EST)
• Postfix-SQL? Rene Bartsch (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:15:34 EST)
  • Re: Postfix-SQL? Magnus Bäck (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:24:10 EST)
• Re: [Postfix/TLS] db files (FIXED) Lutz Jaenicke (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 11:42:31 EST)
• Re: upgrade problem (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 12:13:09 EST)
• Set Up FastNet USA (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 12:11:09 EST)
  • Re: Set Up (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 12:58:42 EST)
• Forgive the newbie question: Mixing Virtual and Local Aleksandr Milewski (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 13:51:44 EST)
  • Re: Forgive the newbie question: Mixing Virtual and Local (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 14:04:31 EST)
  • Re: Forgive the newbie question: Mixing Virtual and Local Aleksandr Milewski (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 14:41:15 EST)
    • Re: Forgive the newbie question: Mixing Virtual and Local (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:21:01 EST)
  • Re: Forgive the newbie question: Mixing Virtual and Local Michael Tokarev (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:04:12 EST)
  • Re: Forgive the newbie question: Mixing Virtual and Local Aleksandr Milewski (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 02:11:22 EST)
• corrupt email David Hill (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 14:11:52 EST)
  • Re: corrupt email Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:16:56 EST)
  • Re: corrupt email Alex van den Bogaerdt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 10:23:43 EST)
  • Re: corrupt email Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:15:50 EST)
  • Re: corrupt email Orlando Andico (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:53:25 EST)
  • Re: corrupt email Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:03:50 EST)
  • Re: corrupt email Alex van den Bogaerdt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:56:34 EST)
• Re: Feature requests: PROXY support (wishlist) Loic Minier (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:17:38 EST)
• Bizzare FastNet USA (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:15:37 EST)
  • Re: Bizzare Paul Robertson (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:48:16 EST)
  • Re: Bizzare Loic Minier (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:17:58 EST)
• Bizzare FastNet USA (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:42:02 EST)
  • Re: Bizzare Loic Minier (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:51:11 EST)
    • Loic Re: Bizzare FastNet USA (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:50:59 EST)
      • Re: Loic Re: Bizzare Loic Minier (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:05:57 EST)
      • Re: Loic Re: Bizzare (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:26:38 EST)
• SuSE8.1 + postfix 2.0.18-20040122 + Beginner (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 15:55:45 EST)
  • Re: SuSE8.1 + postfix 2.0.18-20040122 + Beginner (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:07:35 EST)
  • Re: SuSE8.1 + postfix 2.0.18-20040122 + Beginner Carsten Kuckuk (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:15:20 EST)
  • Re: SuSE8.1 + postfix 2.0.18-20040122 + Beginner (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:45:03 EST)
  • Re: SuSE8.1 + postfix 2.0.18-20040122 + Beginner Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:51:12 EST)
• error : 550 You are not allowed to send mail Lee Dehmer (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:19:56 EST)
  • Re: error : 550 You are not allowed to send mail David L. Dewey (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:18:29 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Postfix policy protocol John Capo (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:49:18 EST)
• How to set up relay_domains Matt Lyon (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:04:25 EST)
  • Re: How to set up relay_domains (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 19:32:30 EST)
• Re: Relay problems ? Peter H. Coffin (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:26:04 EST)
• Archiving all Postfix mail Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 20:29:35 EST)
  • Re: Archiving all Postfix mail (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:11:56 EST)
  • Re: Archiving all Postfix mail Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:27:12 EST)
  • Re: Archiving all Postfix mail (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 00:09:24 EST)
  • Re: Archiving all Postfix mail Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:23:36 EST)
    • Re: Archiving all Postfix mail (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:10:59 EST)
• Postfix, Sasl and MySQL (no email) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:08:07 EST)
  • Re: Postfix, Sasl and MySQL Andreas Winkelmann (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:57:01 EST)
  • RE: Postfix, Sasl and MySQL Ray Anderson (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:35:00 EST)
  • Re: Postfix, Sasl and MySQL suomi hasler (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:11:24 EST)
  • Re: Postfix, Sasl and MySQL (no email) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:05:01 EST)
  • RE: Postfix, Sasl and MySQL Ray Anderson (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:19:23 EST)
• OT-Fail over servers (no name) (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 21:30:47 EST)
  • Re: OT-Fail over servers Dean Strik (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 22:16:16 EST)
  • Re: OT-Fail over servers Paul Robertson (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 22:27:53 EST)
  • Re: OT-Fail over servers Terry Gilsenan (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 22:45:09 EST)
  • Re: OT-Fail over servers Greg A. Woods (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:24:05 EST)
• Mail Store + Blocking attachments Stephen Gillett (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 22:31:45 EST)
  • Re: Mail Store + Blocking attachments Peter H. Coffin (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:28:48 EST)
• Re: DNS Load Balancing Tobias Reckhard (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 00:36:38 EST)
  • Re: DNS Load Balancing Dean Strik (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 01:40:42 EST)
  • Re: DNS Load Balancing Dean Strik (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:01:15 EST)
  • Re: DNS Load Balancing (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:23:01 EST)
  • Re: DNS Load Balancing Dean Strik (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:25:25 EST)
• Unsuscribe (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 01:51:03 EST)
• Virtual Domains vmmail (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:12:57 EST)
  • Re: Virtual Domains vmmail (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:34:10 EST)
  • Re: Virtual Domains Magnus Bäck (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:41:37 EST)
  • Re: Virtual Domains vmmail (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 04:56:18 EST)
• Re: Sending a '250' acknowledgement. Eivind Olsen (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 05:05:23 EST)
• AW: Postfix, Sasl and MySQL Nikolas Hagelstein (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 05:21:20 EST)
• Re: how to reject mail from existing domain but has no MX record Thomas Anderson (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 05:21:30 EST)
• Control-Z in attached text file Markus Schlup (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 05:58:13 EST)
  • Re: Control-Z in attached text file Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:16:48 EST)
  • Re: Control-Z in attached text file Markus Schlup (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:56:03 EST)
  • Re: Control-Z in attached text file Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 10:06:34 EST)
• smtpd.conf being ignored Ralf Hildebrandt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:31:15 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Sylvain (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:42:32 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 07:40:49 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Luc Brouard (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:46:55 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Luc Brouard (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:49:44 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Deives Michellis (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:52:21 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Ralf Hildebrandt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 07:20:32 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Luc Brouard (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 07:28:21 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Ralf Hildebrandt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 07:30:23 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Andreas Winkelmann (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:22:20 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Luca Berra (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:37:27 EST)
  • Re: smtpd.conf being ignored Ralf Hildebrandt (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 00:59:42 EST)
• Message copy being sent to root Darius Matuliauskas (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:41:40 EST)
• TLS with self-signed cert Paul Hutchings (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 06:49:52 EST)
• How to relay and rewrite envelope based on header bjoern (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:14:00 EST)
• Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Rene Bartsch (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:40:43 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:45:53 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Orlando Andico (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:48:54 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Orlando Andico (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 08:50:43 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 10:00:22 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Michael Tokarev (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:32:40 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Rene Bartsch (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:35:45 EST)
  • RE: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Andrzej Kukula (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:50:09 EST)
  • RE: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Orlando Andico (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:53:02 EST)
  • RE: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Len Conrad (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 10:12:24 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Michael Tokarev (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:35:14 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Rene Bartsch (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:25:19 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Greg A. Woods (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:29:14 EST)
  • Re: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Orlando Andico (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:26:42 EST)
  • RE: Feature Suggestion: Tar-Pit flag in Postfix 2.1 proxy Andrzej Kukula (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 03:27:12 EST)
• Sending mail as alternate email address Robert Krueger (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 10:03:42 EST)
  • Re: Sending mail as alternate email address Fred Frigerio (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:24:29 EST)
  • Re: Sending mail as alternate email address Erwan David (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:31:22 EST)
  • Re: Sending mail as alternate email address Robert Krueger (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:06:36 EST)
  • Re: Sending mail as alternate email address Robert Krueger (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:37:00 EST)
• (no subject) Belter Steve Ortiz M. (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 10:35:17 EST)
• Delete message older than 60 days Dominique Feyer (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:17:52 EST)
  • Re: Delete message older than 60 days Andrew Bogecho (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:14:19 EST)
• SPF support in postfix Timo Schoeler (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:25:49 EST)
  • Re: SPF support in postfix Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:27:52 EST)
    • AW: SPF support in postfix Timo Schoeler (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:35:15 EST)
• aliases pointed at commands, WAS: Re: MyDoom war front (Postfix + Vexira Antivirus) Leeman Strout (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:46:55 EST)
  • RE: aliases pointed at commands, WAS: Re: MyDoom war front (Postfix + Vexira Antivirus) Ray Anderson (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:52:22 EST)
• excluding hosts from relay-domain Bahram Paiani (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 12:52:49 EST)
  • Re: excluding hosts from relay-domain (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:13:50 EST)
• Re: Warning Worm/MyDoom.A1 spreading very fast! Mike Vanecek (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:24:56 EST)
  • Re: Warning Worm/MyDoom.A1 spreading very fast! Voytek Eymont (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:00:45 EST)
  • Re: Warning Worm/MyDoom.A1 spreading very fast! Alex van den Bogaerdt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:53:12 EST)
• o'reilly article on postfix (cyrus et al.) on Mac OS X 'Panther' Timo Schoeler (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:28:13 EST)
• nothing works... Pedro Vieira (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 11:49:26 EST)
  • Re: nothing works... Steve Crawford (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:26:36 EST)
  • Re: nothing works... Luca Berra (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:59:17 EST)
• Warning: string length > 4096 Victor Saase (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:47:01 EST)
  • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:59:36 EST)
    • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Victor Saase (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:01:16 EST)
      • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:38:44 EST)
  • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Dean Strik (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:11:55 EST)
  • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:14:17 EST)
    • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Victor Saase (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:23:45 EST)
  • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:35:43 EST)
  • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Roger B.A. Klorese (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 03:30:00 EST)
  • Re: Warning: string length > 4096 Rod Dorman (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:04:25 EST)
  • RE: Warning: string length > 4096 Roger B.A. Klorese (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:26:22 EST)
• postfix smtpd rate control Ceylan, Tolga (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:44:29 EST)
  • Re: postfix smtpd rate control Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 13:54:14 EST)
  • RE: postfix smtpd rate control Ceylan, Tolga (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:04:25 EST)
    • RE: postfix smtpd rate control (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 05:17:21 EST)
• PATCH: Warning: string length > 4096 Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:25:56 EST)
• Attempting to deny more spam Jim Trigg (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:58:28 EST)
  • Re: Attempting to deny more spam Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:52:02 EST)
• flags setting in master.cf Morten Trab (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:02:47 EST)
  • Re: flags setting in master.cf (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:05:09 EST)
    • Re: flags setting in master.cf Morten Trab (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:09:58 EST)
• (no subject) B vd Zon (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:35:06 EST)
• HELO bypassing blackist Cybertime Hostmaster (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:57:13 EST)
  • Re: HELO bypassing blackist Noel Jones (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:10:26 EST)
    • Re: HELO bypassing blackist Cybertime Hostmaster (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:10:45 EST)
  • Re: HELO bypassing blackist Noel Jones (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:30:38 EST)
    • Re: HELO bypassing blackist Cybertime Hostmaster (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:48:03 EST)
• Interaction of append_dot_mydomain w/ recipient restrictions? Lars Kellogg-Stedman (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 15:58:00 EST)
  • Re: Interaction of append_dot_mydomain w/ recipient restrictions? Wietse Venema (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:35:09 EST)
  • Re: Interaction of append_dot_mydomain w/ recipient restrictions? (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:48:24 EST)
  • Re: Interaction of append_dot_mydomain w/ recipient restrictions? Lars Kellogg-Stedman (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:15:45 EST)
• Insert an X-Originally-To header Morten Trab (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:22:31 EST)
• i'm looking for a file Axiole.com - Yannick (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:24:58 EST)
  • RE: i'm looking for a file Alan Munday (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:41:04 EST)
  • Re: i'm looking for a file Falko Timme (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 19:58:26 EST)
• any ideas how to load-balance 2 postfix instances ? Oliver Thalmann (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:30:29 EST)
  • Re: any ideas how to load-balance 2 postfix instances ? Jonathan Nichols (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 16:34:30 EST)
  • Re: any ideas how to load-balance 2 postfix instances ? Alex van den Bogaerdt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:08:55 EST)
  • Re: any ideas how to load-balance 2 postfix instances ? Len Conrad (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:43:33 EST)
  • Re: any ideas how to load-balance 2 postfix instances ? Jason Chang (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 18:23:59 EST)
  • Re: any ideas how to load-balance 2 postfix instances ? Tobias Reckhard (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 03:24:46 EST)
• Virtual domains/users aliase Jeremy Ford (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:01:32 EST)
  • Re: Virtual domains/users aliase Jeremy Ford (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 22:34:28 EST)
• RE: Postfix Guru Needed (FT Position in Southern CA) Kevin Merritt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 17:36:04 EST)
• rewrite outbound mail for certain users Jonathan Nichols (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 19:08:33 EST)
  • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 05:37:01 EST)
  • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users Jonathan Nichols (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:49:44 EST)
  • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:59:51 EST)
    • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 19:09:10 EST)
  • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 19:17:01 EST)
  • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users Jonathan Nichols (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:45:13 EST)
  • Re: rewrite outbound mail for certain users (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 21:07:33 EST)
• (no subject) trichard (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 19:44:54 EST)
• Re: IP range to CIDR Will Yardley (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 20:12:08 EST)
• mydoom.b regex for body checks? Carl Brewer (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 20:34:58 EST)
  • Re: mydoom.b regex for body checks? Noel Jones (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:43:56 EST)
• Sending with wrong domain appended to user. Brian Schmidt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:14:58 EST)
  • Re: Sending with wrong domain appended to user. (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:36:14 EST)
  • Re: Sending with wrong domain appended to user. Brian Schmidt (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:37:10 EST)
  • Re: Sending with wrong domain appended to user. (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:53:30 EST)
  • Re: Sending with wrong domain appended to user. Brian Schmidt (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:03:18 EST)
  • Re: Sending with wrong domain appended to user. (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:16:49 EST)
  • Re: Sending with wrong domain appended to user. Brian Schmidt (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:54:58 EST)
• How can I reject these? Kevin Merritt (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:19:46 EST)
  • Re: How can I reject these? Noel Jones (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:44:27 EST)
  • Re: How can I reject these? Kenwey (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 01:10:33 EST)
  • Re: How can I reject these? Magnus Bäck (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:48:33 EST)
  • Re: How can I reject these? Tony Earnshaw (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 04:12:22 EST)
    • [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Alex van den Bogaerdt (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 07:07:13 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Tony Earnshaw (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 03:42:25 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Cameron Knowlton (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:38:51 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? John Peach (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:16:46 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Alex van den Bogaerdt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:07:07 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Erwan David (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:13:49 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Scott Lambert (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:25:28 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Erwan David (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:39:04 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Scott Lambert (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:48:08 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Alex van den Bogaerdt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:52:26 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Peter H. Coffin (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 00:42:38 EST)
      • Re: [OT] Re: How can I reject these? Laurent Wacrenier (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 08:46:50 EST)
  • Re: How can I reject these? Cybertime Hostmaster (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:17:25 EST)
• postfix doesn't work ! Axiole.com - Yannick (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:19:50 EST)
  • Re: postfix doesn't work ! Magnus Bäck (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:35:36 EST)
• unknown error HELO Clermont Thierry (operations) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:21:21 EST)
  • Re: unknown error HELO Noel Jones (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:36:35 EST)
• what's the difference between maildrop and postdrop in /etc/group? (no name) (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 23:26:07 EST)
  • Re: what's the difference between maildrop and postdrop in /etc/group? Ben Rosengart (Thu Feb 19 2004 - 14:57:57 EST)
• Joe jobbing and postfix Lars Roland Tackmann (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 01:00:20 EST)
  • Re: Joe jobbing and postfix Magnus Bäck (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:40:33 EST)
• (no subject) (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 01:23:09 EST)
• virtual domains Carl Smith (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:14:59 EST)
• Postfix admin Carl Smith (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 02:28:07 EST)
  • RE: Postfix admin Alan Munday (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 05:23:58 EST)
  • RE: Postfix admin (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:20:32 EST)
  • Re: Postfix admin Roger B.A. Klorese (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 03:21:32 EST)
• RFC: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Liviu Daia (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 04:08:16 EST)
  • Re: RFC: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 04:20:05 EST)
  • Re: RFC: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Liviu Daia (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:10:34 EST)
  • Re: RFC: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 07:20:30 EST)
  • Re: RFC: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Ralf Hildebrandt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:35:11 EST)
  • Re: RFC: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luc Brouard (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:06:44 EST)
• Regexp for Microsoft spams Andrew Boothman (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:12:04 EST)
  • Re: Regexp for Microsoft spams Michel Guillou (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:22:53 EST)
  • Re: Regexp for Microsoft spams Andrew Boothman (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:34:22 EST)
• Problems with postfix & virtual mail Peter Fastre (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:54:35 EST)
• postmaster report tagging Ejvind, Kristian (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 06:59:09 EST)
• Joe Jobbing countermeasures Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 07:52:50 EST)
  • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Covington, Chris (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:33:45 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:12:04 EST)
  • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Covington, Chris (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:49:50 EST)
    • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Chateauneuf (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:06:38 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:03:28 EST)
  • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Covington, Chris (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:48:59 EST)
    • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:55:23 EST)
      • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Mike Vanecek (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:51:47 EST)
  • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:57:03 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:00:53 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Jim Norton (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:04:05 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:11:59 EST)
  • RE: Joe Jobbing countermeasures Covington, Chris (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:14:18 EST)
• parameter value overflow in main.cf Marcin Gryszkalis (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:02:22 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:56:19 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:58:48 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf Marcin Gryszkalis (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:29:07 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:41:02 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:16:06 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf Marcin Gryszkalis (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 04:40:38 EST)
  • Re: parameter value overflow in main.cf Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:34:11 EST)
• Problem with Postfix and ldap Jim Greene (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:17:04 EST)
  • Re: Problem with Postfix and ldap (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:23:28 EST)
    • Re: Problem with Postfix and ldap Jim Greene (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:26:54 EST)
  • Re: Problem with Postfix and ldap Magnus Bäck (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 09:26:07 EST)
• Problems with local delivery Thilo Wagner (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:53:25 EST)
• Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures[NOISE] Loic Minier (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:16:13 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures[NOISE] Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:22:55 EST)
  • Re: Joe Jobbing countermeasures[NOISE] Liviu Daia (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:52:36 EST)
• Compiler for a Solaris binary Loic Minier (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:20:13 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:30:39 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Marcio Merlone (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:42:05 EST)
    • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Timo Schoeler (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:49:30 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:18:42 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:22:38 EST)
    • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Timo Schoeler (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:30:59 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:26:02 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:31:51 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 11:35:45 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:35:31 EST)
    • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Timo Schoeler (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:08:25 EST)
  • Re: Compiler for a Solaris binary Geoff Gibbs (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:50:18 EST)
• (no subject) Tony Earnshaw (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 08:51:57 EST)
  • Re: TLS cert problem trichard (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 23:21:32 EST)
• unsuscribe Patricio Antonio N. Calderon D. (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:03:25 EST)
• RBL: Doing what I SWORE I would never do. Chateauneuf (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:09:58 EST)
  • Re: RBL: Doing what I SWORE I would never do. Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:48:41 EST)
    • Re: RBL: Doing what I SWORE I would never do. Chateauneuf (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:51:01 EST)
  • Re: RBL: Doing what I SWORE I would never do. Noel Jones (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:57:42 EST)
  • Re: RBL: Doing what I SWORE I would never do. Chateauneuf (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:11:04 EST)
• internal smarthost / relay Leeman Strout (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:17:14 EST)
• network_biopair errors?!? Paul Hutchings (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:43:49 EST)
  • Re: network_biopair errors?!? (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:37:06 EST)
  • RE: network_biopair errors?!? Paul Hutchings (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:40:25 EST)
    • RE: network_biopair errors?!? (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:48:54 EST)
  • RE: network_biopair errors?!? (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:03:05 EST)
  • Re: network_biopair errors?!? Lutz Jaenicke (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:55:13 EST)
• Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Jason Williams (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:44:48 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 12:50:21 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 13:30:19 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Amos (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:10:59 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:26:21 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Jason Williams (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:38:55 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:01:32 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:05:19 EST)
    • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:14:25 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Amos (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:11:55 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Carl P. Corliss (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:17:47 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:24:55 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 15:43:19 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + Cyrus-Imapd + ACL usage Luca Berra (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 16:40:23 EST)
• Reporting deliveries to/from from logs Andrew J Caines (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:08:01 EST)
  • Re: Reporting deliveries to/from from logs Noel Jones (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:47:28 EST)
• Sending internet mail from LAN - the "right" way. Daniel Miller (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 18:37:48 EST)
  • Re: Sending internet mail from LAN - the "right" way. Daniel Miller (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:22:45 EST)
• How do I... Bengt Hammarlin (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 19:36:21 EST)
  • Re: How do I... Cybertime Hostmaster (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:50:05 EST)
  • Re: How do I... (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:46:57 EST)
  • Re: How do I... (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 20:56:24 EST)
  • Re: How do I... (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 04:00:12 EST)
  • Re: How do I... Andrew J Caines (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:25:07 EST)
• mail for domain.tld loops back to myself Brian Schmidt (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 19:39:35 EST)
  • Re: mail for domain.tld loops back to myself Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 21:57:56 EST)
    • Re: mail for domain.tld loops back to myself (no name) (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 22:09:26 EST)
  • Re: mail for domain.tld loops back to myself Brian Schmidt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 01:23:21 EST)
• Relaying problems continue. Matt Lyon (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 21:06:13 EST)
  • Re: Relaying problems continue. Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 21:56:09 EST)
• smtpd restrictions Michael 'Moose' Dinn (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 22:40:14 EST)
  • Re: smtpd restrictions Wietse Venema (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 22:48:35 EST)
• Blocking Contenet and attachments Stephen Gillett (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 23:21:45 EST)
• Worried about Postfix startup (new install) DALive Editor (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 23:43:41 EST)
  • Re: Worried about Postfix startup (new install) (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:30:46 EST)
  • Re: Worried about Postfix startup (new install) Simon J Mudd (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:09:15 EST)
• local_recipient_maps doesn't appear to be working. Paul C (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 01:26:28 EST)
• mail to local users and hotmail Milen (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 03:22:28 EST)
  • Re: mail to local users and hotmail (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 03:59:18 EST)
  • RE: mail to local users and hotmail Matt Lyon (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:12:04 EST)
• What is returned by $recipient in master.cf? Morten Trab (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 03:27:31 EST)
  • Re: What is returned by $recipient in master.cf? Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:34:48 EST)
• qmail to postfix T. Albert (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 04:42:24 EST)
• body_checks Eicke (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 05:36:08 EST)
  • Re: body_checks Patrick Ben Koetter (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 05:51:57 EST)
  • Re: body_checks Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:32:48 EST)
• restricting users to internal mail Hans du Plooy (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 05:45:56 EST)
• postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:25:40 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:32:01 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:39:29 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:11:30 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:49:30 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:02:35 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:05:17 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Dan Lannom (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:27:27 EST)
    • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:30:38 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:39:59 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs José Luis Tallón (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:41:19 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:49:41 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:50:15 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:56:51 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:59:20 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:57:23 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:01:03 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:06:12 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:07:04 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:05:53 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:06:18 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:10:13 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:13:09 EST)
    • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:19:08 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:25:05 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:31:43 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:55:57 EST)
    • Re: postfix + ocfs cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:09:47 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:14:31 EST)
    • Re: postfix + ocfs cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:43:50 EST)
  • RE: postfix + ocfs Brian M. Diehl (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:16:23 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:31:58 EST)
  • RE: postfix + ocfs Brian M. Diehl (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:42:33 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs cami (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:45:16 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Dean Strik (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:46:38 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Ralf Hildebrandt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:26:11 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:28:39 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Ralf Hildebrandt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:29:49 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:39:44 EST)
  • Re: postfix + ocfs Ralf Hildebrandt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:41:14 EST)
• newbie problem... Pedro Vieira (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 05:53:40 EST)
• In which version are available reject_unverified_sender/recipient/ Thomas Anderson (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:20:25 EST)
  • Re: In which version are available reject_unverified_sender/recipient/ Magnus Bäck (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:33:38 EST)
  • Re: In which version are available reject_unverified_sender/recipient/ Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:48:01 EST)
• mail relaying too limited Emma Grant (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:30:46 EST)
  • Re: mail relaying too limited (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:12:45 EST)
  • Separating incoming and outgoing relay restrictions. Josh Endries (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:51:15 EST)
    • Re: Separating incoming and outgoing relay restrictions. (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:36:14 EST)
• SMTP AUTH Frank (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:39:31 EST)
  • Re: SMTP AUTH Magnus Bäck (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:59:24 EST)
  • Re: SMTP AUTH Frank (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:42:33 EST)
  • Re: SMTP AUTH Patrick Ben Koetter (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:45 EST)
  • Re: SMTP AUTH Frank (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:57:31 EST)
• Startting Postfix from inetd / xinted / tcpserver super server Dinesh Shah (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 08:27:49 EST)
  • Re: Startting Postfix from inetd / xinted / tcpserver super server Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:04:51 EST)
• mail relaying too limited David Grant (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:20:23 EST)
• PATCH: more SASL doc additions Liviu Daia (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 09:50:37 EST)
• DCC support Javier Henderson (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:13:43 EST)
  • Re: DCC support Ralf Hildebrandt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:30:09 EST)
• Re: In which version are available reject_unverified_sender/recip ient/ Thomas Anderson (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:03:09 EST)
  • Re: In which version are available reject_unverified_sender/recip ient/ Magnus Bäck (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:27:53 EST)
• Problems with local delivery to Cyrus Thilo Wagner (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:49:24 EST)
• [sort of OT] Re: postfix + ocfs Alex van den Bogaerdt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:23:05 EST)
  • Re: [sort of OT] Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:34:46 EST)
  • Re: [sort of OT] Re: postfix + ocfs Alex van den Bogaerdt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:45:44 EST)
  • Re: [sort of OT] Re: postfix + ocfs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:50:55 EST)
  • Re: [sort of OT] Re: postfix + ocfs Alex van den Bogaerdt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 04:32:47 EST)
• Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Nikolas Hagelstein (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:57:24 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Laurent Wacrenier (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:06:21 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:56:40 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Bernd Matthes (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:09:58 EST)
  • Re: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Laurent Wacrenier (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 06:13:57 EST)
• aliases and relay problems... Pedro Vieira (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 10:09:15 EST)
  • Re: aliases and relay problems... Chateauneuf (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:49:29 EST)
  • Re: aliases and relay problems... Pedro Vieira (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 11:50:12 EST)
• AW: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Nikolas Hagelstein (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:46:06 EST)
  • Re: AW: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? José Luis Tallón (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:11:39 EST)
• TCP characteristics of SMTP sessions? Lars Hecking (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:50:41 EST)
  • Re: TCP characteristics of SMTP sessions? Paul Newhouse (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:54:31 EST)
  • Re: TCP characteristics of SMTP sessions? Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 12:59:36 EST)
• AW: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Nikolas Hagelstein (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:05:04 EST)
• AW: Postfix + MySql - reducing queries? Nikolas Hagelstein (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:29:32 EST)
• Postfix and relay restrictions (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:41:34 EST)
  • RE: Postfix and relay restrictions Covington, Chris (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:08:35 EST)
  • RE: Postfix and relay restrictions (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:11:25 EST)
• 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Gareth (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:52:52 EST)
  • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:55:55 EST)
    • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Gareth (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:59:55 EST)
      • RE: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Roger B.A. Klorese (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:05:11 EST)
      • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Gareth (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:09:43 EST)
      • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:22:50 EST)
      • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Gareth (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:34:42 EST)
      • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:58:25 EST)
      • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:09:29 EST)
  • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers Gareth (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 04:08:06 EST)
  • Re: 'Delivered-To:' mail headers (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:47:18 EST)
• Re: verizon can't send me mail Tom Reingold (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:20:22 EST)
• removing 127.0.0.1 amavisd logging dogface (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:41:24 EST)
  • [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please dogface (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 12:35:31 EST)
    • RE: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Boring, Andrew (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 12:49:20 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please dogface (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:20:59 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Noel Jones (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:35:01 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Jussi Silvennoinen (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:10:14 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please dogface (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:34:19 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Rob Foehl (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:01:16 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please [kinda solved] dogface (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:19:37 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please [kinda solved] Philip Reynolds (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 22:58:48 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please [kinda solved] dogface (Mon Feb 09 2004 - 10:42:31 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Niclas Öhman (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 15:29:57 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Ralf Hildebrandt (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 03:04:30 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Simon J Mudd (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 07:08:35 EST)
    • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Peter Santiago (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:35:12 EST)
      • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please dogface (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 14:57:58 EST)
    • Re: [OT] need help reducing the size of maillogs please Peter Bieringer (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 13:55:13 EST)
• Postfix Backscatter Readme Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:50:57 EST)
  • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Dan Hollis (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 14:58:51 EST)
  • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:06:31 EST)
  • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Bob Proulx (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 20:03:56 EST)
  • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Wietse Venema (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 20:49:40 EST)
    • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 08:55:32 EST)
  • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Bob Proulx (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 22:00:42 EST)
  • Re: Postfix Backscatter Readme Liviu Daia (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 23:29:56 EST)
• Postfix Statistics Export Ian Duggan (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:06:44 EST)
• alias.. returned mail Pedro Vieira (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 13:16:40 EST)
  • Re: alias.. returned mail Chateauneuf (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:19:39 EST)
  • Re: alias.. returned mail Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:07:41 EST)
  • Re: alias.. returned mail Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:08:10 EST)
  • Re: alias.. returned mail Pedro Vieira (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 05:36:29 EST)
  • Re: alias.. returned mail Luca Berra (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 07:45:23 EST)
• Multiple virtual domain files, one for each domain only? Adam Kessel (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:19:41 EST)
  • Re: Multiple virtual domain files, one for each domain only? Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:27:26 EST)
  • Re: Multiple virtual domain files, one for each domain only? Adam Kessel (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:26:35 EST)
  • Re: Multiple virtual domain files, one for each domain only? Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:41:33 EST)
• Headers Niclas Öhman (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:36:31 EST)
  • RE: Headers Covington, Chris (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:41:48 EST)
    • Re: Headers Niclas Öhman (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:52:51 EST)
    • RE: Headers Mike Vanecek (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:49:56 EST)
  • Re: Headers Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:10:01 EST)
• using port 2525 for sending emails/SMTP--how should it look in master.cf? Robert Kudyba (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:43:03 EST)
  • Re: using port 2525 for sending emails/SMTP--how should it look in master.cf? Devdas Bhagat (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:37:54 EST)
• helo slave ??? Merlin Wilkerson (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 15:53:53 EST)
  • Re: helo slave ??? Noel Jones (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:08:21 EST)
• Re: How many developers are working on postfix Devdas Bhagat (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:14:39 EST)
• Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Chateauneuf (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:26:56 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Devdas Bhagat (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:27:19 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Chateauneuf (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:31:36 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Rob Foehl (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:37:26 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Devdas Bhagat (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:36:19 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Chateauneuf (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:41:35 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Devdas Bhagat (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:43:50 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Chateauneuf (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:52:48 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Rob Foehl (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:57:15 EST)
  • Re: Jim Seymour's Example (RBL) Noel Jones (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:38:40 EST)
• blocking spam at smtp time using postfix+spamassassin Jon Gabrielson (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:23:12 EST)
  • Re: blocking spam at smtp time using postfix+spamassassin Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:06:27 EST)
• qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 16:31:06 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:07:36 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:39:32 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:42:32 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:03:45 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:24:15 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:57:52 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:40:58 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:10:31 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:12:33 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:13:53 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:23:24 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:08:51 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:09:27 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:19:58 EST)
    • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Cybertime Hostmaster (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:43:31 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:29:55 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:37:38 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:38:33 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:41:17 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:43:43 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:46:57 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Len Conrad (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 23:13:57 EST)
  • Re: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:39:41 EST)
• Changing SMTP error sleep strategy Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:24:21 EST)
  • Re: Changing SMTP error sleep strategy (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:01:00 EST)
  • Re: Changing SMTP error sleep strategy Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:05:07 EST)
• PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 17:57:32 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Dean Strik (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:00:37 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:16:31 EST)
    • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:27:03 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Liviu Daia (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:53:49 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:02:39 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Liviu Daia (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:11:40 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Luca Berra (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:18:56 EST)
  • Re: PATCH: configurable path for SASL plugins (was: Re: smtpd.conf being ignored) Liviu Daia (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:30:07 EST)
• RE: Postfix suddenly started crashing.... Nick Fisher (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:01:23 EST)
• max_use and logs Kelly Sauke (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 18:22:57 EST)
  • Re: max_use and logs Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:42:59 EST)
• Patch: Sender based SASL-authentification and sender based relay selection Mathias Hasselmann (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:34:25 EST)
  • Re: Patch: Sender based SASL-authentification and sender based relay selection Luca Berra (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 03:00:17 EST)
• Not enough smtpd processes? Kevin Merritt (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 19:56:32 EST)
  • Re: Not enough smtpd processes? Cybertime Hostmaster (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:11:53 EST)
  • Re: Not enough smtpd processes? Cybertime Hostmaster (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:41:00 EST)
• PATCH: qmgr pid killed by signal 6 Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 21:45:46 EST)
• OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange Tom Warfield (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:05:50 EST)
  • Re: OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange pheonix1t (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:26:18 EST)
  • Re: OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange Luca Berra (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 02:17:09 EST)
  • Re: OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange Petri Riihikallio (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 06:23:37 EST)
    • Re: OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange Hans du Plooy (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 06:43:25 EST)
    • Re: OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange F. Even (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:23:26 EST)
  • Re: OT - Postfix and other tools to emulate MS-Exchange Petri Riihikallio (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:47:36 EST)
• Postfix re-writing sender From address Jeremy Ford (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:41:42 EST)
  • Re: Postfix re-writing sender From address Wietse Venema (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 23:04:49 EST)
    • Re: Postfix re-writing sender From address Jeremy Ford (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:17:21 EST)
      • Re: Postfix re-writing sender From address Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:32:37 EST)
  • Fw: Postfix re-writing sender From address Jeremy Ford (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:39:16 EST)
• E-mail recipient for internal LAN only (no name) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 23:39:42 EST)
• User/Domain location mapping Tom Warfield (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 23:59:38 EST)
  • Re: User/Domain location mapping Philip Reynolds (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 03:51:53 EST)
• LDAP per user mailHost Jeff Williams (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 01:12:36 EST)
  • Re: LDAP per user mailHost (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:45:31 EST)
• anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 01:36:05 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:38:32 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:11:00 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:21:30 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:21:09 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:32:04 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:22:14 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:54:44 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:01:48 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 19:01:35 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 19:17:45 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 19:35:01 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Ralf Hildebrandt (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 00:45:47 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 01:10:51 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Ralf Hildebrandt (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 03:42:30 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 09:44:23 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Ralf Hildebrandt (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 10:16:40 EST)
  • Re: anvil/smtpd action? Len Conrad (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 16:42:16 EST)
• postcat "not a valid queue file" -- ideas? Roger B.A. Klorese (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 04:03:22 EST)
  • Re: postcat "not a valid queue file" -- ideas? Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:37:04 EST)
• config 'problem' Mark Huizer (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 05:37:05 EST)
  • Re: config 'problem' Alex van den Bogaerdt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 05:57:07 EST)
  • Re: config 'problem' Mark Huizer (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 06:28:49 EST)
  • Re: config 'problem' Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:35:11 EST)
  • Re: config 'problem' (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:53:59 EST)
  • Re: config 'problem' Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:34:57 EST)
• D state of smtp/lmtp/cleanup Sascha Lucas (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 05:40:15 EST)
  • Re: D state of smtp/lmtp/cleanup (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:51:10 EST)
    • Re: D state of smtp/lmtp/cleanup Sascha Lucas (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 10:16:07 EST)
• Some clients cannot connect to the server after several tries German Viera (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:46:09 EST)
  • Re: Some clients cannot connect to the server after several tries Mark Huizer (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:50:29 EST)
• Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Joey (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:45:26 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Mark Huizer (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:53:11 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Deives Michellis (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 07:57:41 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! John Peach (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:48:17 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Deives Michellis (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:14:34 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Matt Egan (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 10:28:33 EST)
  • RE: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Covington, Chris (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:40:04 EST)
  • RE: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Joey (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 08:16:09 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Matt Egan (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 09:41:31 EST)
  • RE: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Joey (Sat Feb 14 2004 - 04:30:34 EST)
  • Re: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Kelly Sauke (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 10:51:04 EST)
  • RE: Local User List for SMTP Gateway to help fight SPAM! Covington, Chris (Mon Feb 16 2004 - 10:59:44 EST)
• Postfix and a large number of Recipients Additive GmbH System Admin (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:11:45 EST)
  • Re: Postfix and a large number of Recipients Ralf Hildebrandt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:15:11 EST)
    • Re: Postfix and a large number of Recipients (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:32:45 EST)
  • Re: Postfix and a large number of Recipients Magnus Bäck (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:27:35 EST)
  • Re: Postfix and a large number of Recipients Ralf Hildebrandt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:51:22 EST)
  • Re: Postfix and a large number of Recipients (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:56:42 EST)
  • Re: Postfix and a large number of Recipients Ralf Hildebrandt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:01:15 EST)
• Changing daemons Axel Hollanda (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:38:39 EST)
  • Re: Changing daemons Magnus Bäck (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:44:30 EST)
• forwaring and multiple domains Lars Roland Tackmann (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 08:45:15 EST)
  • Re: forwaring and multiple domains Devdas Bhagat (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:47:19 EST)
• [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 Robert Brooks (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:08:02 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:15:28 EST)
    • Postfix 2.1 Features Patrick (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:18:44 EST)
      • Re: Postfix 2.1 Features (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:23:35 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 Robert Brooks (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:35:20 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 Ralf Hildebrandt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:36:27 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:41:29 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 Ralf Hildebrandt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:42:48 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 Robert Brooks (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:49:42 EST)
  • Re: [patch] CIDR support for official postfix release 2.0.18 Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 10:18:22 EST)
• Rejecting from RBL what we have configured in access to relay Joey (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:19:51 EST)
• postfix won't connect to MySQL (freebsd / no chroot) Patrick Proniewski (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 09:29:06 EST)
  • Re: postfix won't connect to MySQL (freebsd / no chroot) (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:55:56 EST)
    • Re: postfix won't connect to MySQL (freebsd / no chroot) Patrick Proniewski (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 16:15:11 EST)
• Postfix snapshot 20040205 available Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:15:48 EST)
• [2.0.18] status=deferred (temporary failure) Robert Fitzpatrick (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:29:48 EST)
  • Re: [2.0.18] status=deferred (temporary failure) Peter Santiago (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:45:26 EST)
• transport problem? Dennis Breithaupt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:30:07 EST)
  • Re: transport problem? Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:24:50 EST)
• anvil request: logging Len Conrad (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:31:37 EST)
  • Re: anvil request: logging Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:23:20 EST)
• Checking wether Postfix is running Loic Minier (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:54:29 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Matt Thoene (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:13:46 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:17:55 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Loic Minier (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:19:17 EST)
    • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Patrick Proniewski (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:35:07 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Loic Minier (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:33:33 EST)
  • RE: Checking wether Postfix is running Paul Hutchings (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:36:32 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:46:20 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Loic Minier (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:56:07 EST)
    • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Matthew Kitchin (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:15:39 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Jay Maynard (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:12:15 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Ralf Hildebrandt (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:43:42 EST)
  • RE: Checking wether Postfix is running Boring, Andrew (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:00:48 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Daniel Miller (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:34:04 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:28:37 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Loic Minier (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 05:15:16 EST)
  • Re: Checking wether Postfix is running Loic Minier (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 05:19:54 EST)
  • RE: Checking wether Postfix is running Boring, Andrew (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 10:29:46 EST)
• smtp error Eicke (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 11:51:13 EST)
• Re: How to remove attachment? yeskw (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 12:07:30 EST)
  • Re: How to remove attachment? Csillag Tamás (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 15:18:11 EST)
• warning: connect to non-existent spam filter Haines Brown (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:02:38 EST)
  • Re: warning: connect to non-existent spam filter Haines Brown (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 17:04:16 EST)
  • RE: warning: connect to non-existent spam filter Boring, Andrew (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 17:25:56 EST)
  • Re: warning: connect to non-existent spam filter Wietse Venema (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 17:38:17 EST)
• error msg on OSX: "fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf: line 125: inet service cannot be private" Robert Kudyba (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:19:55 EST)
  • Re: error msg on OSX: "fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf: line 125: inet service cannot be private" Ralf Hildebrandt (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 00:44:15 EST)
  • Re: error msg on OSX: "fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf: line 125: inet service cannot be private" Robert Kudyba (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 17:59:51 EST)
  • Re: error msg on OSX: "fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf: line 125: inet service cannot be private" (no name) (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 18:05:56 EST)
• Policy service support Rene Mayrhofer (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:20:31 EST)
  • Re: Policy service support (no name) (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 15:44:30 EST)
• saslauth and virtual domains Naria Sheikhalikani (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 14:33:42 EST)
  • saslauth and virtual domains (second post) Naria Sheikhalikani (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 17:21:33 EST)
    • Re: saslauth and virtual domains (second post) Patrick Ben Koetter (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 17:46:20 EST)
      • Re: saslauth and virtual domains (second post) Naria Sheikhalikani (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 18:21:21 EST)
      • Re: saslauth and virtual domains (second post) Patrick Ben Koetter (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 02:29:53 EST)
      • Re: saslauth and virtual domains (second post) Naria Sheikhal