450 or 550 code

From: Gator (no email)
Date: Thu Nov 13 2003 - 23:26:56 EST

• Next message: (no name): "Re: Where Goes reject_unauth_pipelining? (was: Re: FW: Definitions-)"
• Previous message: Jim Seymour: "Re: Where Goes reject_unauth_pipelining? (was: Re: FW: Definitions-)"
• Next in thread: (no name): "Re: 450 or 550 code"
• Reply: (no name): "Re: 450 or 550 code"
• Reply: (no name): "Re: 450 or 550 code"
• Maybe reply: Luigi Rosa: "Re[2]: 450 or 550 code"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is it better to respond to an unknown address with a 450 or a 550 code?
I'm not sure I understand the difference. Which one would tell a
spammer to not try again (as if they care that much).

Thanks - Jack

• Next message: (no name): "Re: Where Goes reject_unauth_pipelining? (was: Re: FW: Definitions-)"
• Previous message: Jim Seymour: "Re: Where Goes reject_unauth_pipelining? (was: Re: FW: Definitions-)"
• Next in thread: (no name): "Re: 450 or 550 code"
• Reply: (no name): "Re: 450 or 550 code"
• Reply: (no name): "Re: 450 or 550 code"
• Maybe reply: Luigi Rosa: "Re[2]: 450 or 550 code"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]