RE: header_checks question (with an ć)

From: Ejvind, Kristian (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:28:37 EDT


Yes, but fully leagal mail do use encoded headers, such as
this mail. Base64 headers *ARE* standard and in wide use outside
the english-speaking countries. If you really
want to fight spam I suggest SpamAssasin. I use it and even with
a rather high threshold it catches about 75% of my spam.

/Kristian

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Maynard [mailto:]
Sent: den 30 september 2003 19:14
To: postfix users
Subject: Re: header_checks question

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:07:34PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> At 12:07 PM 9/30/03, Peter Milne wrote:
> > > It is acceptable and legal to encode header lines this way. You will
> > > indeed find many posts to this list use this type of
> > > encoding. Unfortunately, this makes bad-word matching in postfix
> > > header_checks difficult.
> >I did find a rule that I think might block it:
> >/^Subject: .*\=\?ISO/
> Not a good idea. This will block legit mail, including many posts on this
> list.

I block Subject: =?ISO-8859-1? .
All last week, it blocked 5 emails. Every one of them was spam sent via
Yahoo! Groups.
So far this week, it's blocked 3 emails. Yes, all via Yahoo! Groups.

The sky is not falling.








Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD