From: List Address (Jeffrey)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 13:14:19 EDT
I'm looking for ideas how to make it easier for people to keep their
text-based filters (header and body checks files) updated. We've had
over a million unique IPs download them, but there are only about
30,000 unique IPs that update regularly.
Any thoughts?
/Jeff
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jeffrey Posluns <>
> To: "Troy Davis" <>
>
> That spam ID was disabled last week. If you're still seeing things
> rejected due to it, then there's probably a server involved that
> hasn't been updated since then. We have no control over how often
> people update their copies of the filters, which can be problematic at
> times..
>
> I would suggest that you check out a rejection email to track down
> whose server needs to be updated.
>
>
> On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 07:47 AM, Troy Davis wrote:
>> SPAM-ID: b20030701-485001
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeffrey Posluns" <>
>> To: "tdavis" <>
>>
>> What's the SPAM-ID that you asked about?
>> I'll make sure it's updated tomorrow morning.
>>
>> On Sunday, August 31, 2003, at 10:53 PM, tdavis wrote:
>>> Already did that, They updated the file but I still have the same
>>> problem. So I emailed them again, and have not had a sponse that was
>>> over a week ago now
>>>
>>> ---------- Original Message -----------
>>> From: Jeffrey Posluns (List Address) <>
>>> To: Tony Earnshaw <>
>>>> You can also email the support guys at
>>>> with the entry that's causing problems, and we'll usually update
>>>> the filter within a day or two...
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 08:58 AM, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>>>>> Magnus Bäck wrote:
>>>>>>> This is a question I have been meaning to ask, I am playing
>>>>>>> around with security sage stuff I think thats the name, But
>>>>>>> there access file is banning one of my customers email
>>>>>>> subscriptions based on the body content.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How can I set up a white list so this does not get rejected?
>>>>>> You can't. body_checks applies to all mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> He can if he uses SpamAssassin as content filter, which is also
>>>>> included in the Securitysage alternatives. Because the latter are
>>>>> alternatives, not hard-and-fast "musts".
>>
>>
>
|
|
|