From: Cami (no email)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 08:48:21 EDT
| | Just kidding... didn't reeeealy wan't to make it look like a real load
| | avg...
| |
| | Your load avg would suggest that you would need 745 more processors to
| | have the load avg back to 1 Doesn't that scare you??
|
| load average is not calculated alone on how busy a processor is, so no ;)
(before anyone replies, that was a joke :P)
|
|
|